Abstract:Objectives: To evaluate and compare the ion-releasing capability of three different restorative systems at the restoration/tooth interface elemental analysis using energy-dispersive X-ray technique. Additionally, micromorphological patterns of the restoration/tooth interfaces was investigated. Materials and methods: Eighteen freshly extracted sound human premolars were collected for the study. The premolars were randomly assigned into 3 groups (n = 6) based on the type of restorative materials used: Giomer (Beautifill II), ion-releasing composite (Activa Presto), and RMGI (Riva Light Cure). Half of the specimens in each group were tested after 24 h (the "immediate group"), while the remaining half were tested after 6 months of storage in deionized water (the "delayed group"). Standardized box-shaped cavities along the cervical area of teeth crowns and restored them with the assigned restorative material following manufacturers' instructions. The specimens were sectioned buccolingually into 2 halves. One half of each specimen was subjected to elemental analysis using energy-dispersive X-ray technique (EDX), while the remaining half was sputter coated and underwent micromorphological analysis of the restoration/tooth interface using a scanning electron microscope (SEM). The collected data from elemental analysis test were tabulated and subjected to statistical analysis. Results: The two-way ANOVA test showed significant differences in both phosphorus and calcium levels among the tested restorative systems (p < 0.05). In the immediate subgroup, RMGI recorded the highest phosphorus level (0.1527), followed by the ion-releasing composite (0.1172), while Giomer exhibited the least levels (0.0326) (p < 0.05). The ion-releasing composite group had the highest calcium level (0.2797), followed by RMGI (0.248), and Giomer (0.2385) respectively (p < 0.05). In the delayed subgroups, Giomer recorded the highest phosphorus level (0.1526), followed by the ion-releasing composite (0.1058), and RMGI group (0.0466) respectively (p < 0.05). RMGI had the highest calcium level (0.2801), followed by the ion-releasing composite (0.2659), and Giomer had the lowest level (0.1792) (p < 0.05). The micromorphological analysis of the restoration/tooth interfaces showed good adaptation between the composite and tooth substrate in different restorative groups. Conclusions: The ion-releasing capability of the three restorative systems appears to be comparable. The rate of mineral release and diffusion is affected by time and composition.

[Measuration of Instantly Galvanic Current Magnitude among Dental Common Restorative Alloys].

Elemental analysis and micromorphological patterns of tooth/restoration interface of three ion-releasing class V restorations

An in vitro quantitative antibacterial analysis of amalgam and composite resins

Evaluation of restorative and implant alloys galvanically coupled to titanium

Effects of Dental Cements on the Stress Distribution in Amalgam-Restored Teeth

Galvanic coupling of steel and gold alloy lingual brackets with orthodontic wires: Is corrosion a concern?

Estimating Ni, Cr, Co, and Mo release from 3 dental casting alloys in saliva and blood at 6 and 12 months by using inductively coupled plasma mass spectroscopy

Metal Release and Cytotoxicity of Different Orthodontic Bracket-Wire Combinations: An In Vitro Study

Differences in Metal Ions Released from Orthodontic Appliances in an In Vitro and In Vivo Setting

Comparison of Two Different Electro Polish Temperature on Cobalt Ion Release of Chromium Cobalt Alloy in Artificial Saliva with Atomic Absorption Spectrophotometry

In Vitro Analysis of Microbiologic Sealing of Two Different Fixed Implant-Supported Prosthesis Designs Cemented By Four Different Dental Cements

Evaluating the Proximal Contact Tightness in Direct or In-direct Restoration of Endodontically Treated Teeth: Randomized Clinical Trial

Evaluating the Effect of Different Mouthrinses on Properties of the Enamel and Dental Composite Surfaces

Comparison of Atraumatic Restorative Treatment and Conventional Restorative Procedures in A Hospital Clinic: Evaluation after 30 Months

Improving orthodontic bonding to silver amalgam

The effect of ascorbic acid, QMix and other conditioning solutions on the bond strength of adhesively luted glass fiber-reinforced composite posts to root dentin, a laboratory study

A Critical Review on the Factors Affecting the Bond Strength of Direct Restorative Material Alternatives to Amalgam

[Effect of composite restoration on the reinforcement of teeth]

PENETRATION OF AMALGAM CORRODED PRODUCTS INTO DENTIN AND ITS EFFECT ON BONDING USING SELF ETCH ADHESIVE SYSTEM VERSUS RESIN MODIFIED GLASS IONOMER

A study of corrosion resistance of five dental alloys used for crowns

Comparison of marginal fit of gold electroforming-ceramic crown,high gold alloy-ceramic crown and nickel chromium alloy-ceramic crown