Abstract:From the perspective of tort law, the transgression criterion of liability of China's state compensatory system pertains to ″subjective transgression″. This cognition of taking transgression as administrative agency's violation of various legal norms by which the attention duty is set up may serve to overcome the limitation of transgression criterion as well as to broaden the scope on which the transgression criterion of liability is applied, although the criterion is still faulted with insuperable limitations. In present legal system, the transgression by this criterion is only considered as violating the laws, statutes and regulation enacted by various legislatures, which seriously restricts the applying scope of the criterion and weakens the function of protecting human rights in China's state compensatory system. In view of the current development in the research on criterion of liability of China's state compensatory system, it is necessary to analyze the internal logic of the criterion of liability of state compensatory law from an academic perspective, so as to reiterate a kind of normative criterion of liability of state compensatory system which is linked to the relatively mature criterion of liability of civil tort law. In the analytical framework of the theory of subjective and objective legal order of analytical positive jurisprudence, the fault criterion liability involves the violation of both the subjective legal order and the objective legal order, and the non-fault criterion only relates violation of the objective order. The ultimate approach to improve the criterion of liability of China's state compensatory system rests with that, the present transgression criterion of liability should be replaced by the fault criterion of liability and the non-fault criterion of liability should be established only as a supplementary criterion.

The Compare of Tort Law's General Provision between China and Germany

The Development of Seller's Defect Warranty Liability in German Law and Its Enlightenment to China

Vergleich und berlegungen zum chinesischen und deutschen Verstndnis des Begriffs Nebenpflicht

A Comparative Study of the Application of the Doctrine of Prosecuting Discretion in Japan,Germany and China

The Construction of the General Rule of Tort Conflicts:A Comparison of Rome Ⅱ and China's Tort Conflicts

A Comparative Research on the Object of Tort Law

Background and Key Contents of the New Chinese Tort Liability Law

Justice in Tort Law of Russia and China

On the Civil Interests Protected by Tort Liability Law

On Methods of Bearing Tort Liability

Analysis on Combination of Pure Economic Loss and Basic Rights under the Tort Law

Punitive damages under the new Chinese Civil Code – a critical and comparative analysis

Countermeasure on the dual expert witness model of medical tort liability

Analysis of Reference of General Tax Law of German to Legislation of China

On the Arrangement of the Imputation Principle of Medical Tort

A Positive Analysis of the Criterion of State Compensatory Liability

Liability Princpile and Liability Premise:Comments on Torts Law Draft

Reflection on the Relations of Tort Law to Special Law and Judicial Interpretation in the Way of Legal Hermeneutics

Chinese Structure for Analyzing Criminal Liability in Transitional Period

Comparison of Legal System of Anti-Bribery Between China and Foreign Countries

On the Relationship between Imputing Principles and Types of Tort Liability