Reliability and Validity of Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression Scale in Different Rural Populations

韩梅,贾存显

2012-01-01

Abstract:Objective To assess the reliability and validity of Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression Scale(CES-D) among the informants of suicides and controls.Methods Totally 202 suicide informants and 271 control informants were consecutively sampled and investigated with the questionnaire.Cronbach's α and Pearson's correlation were used to assess the internal consistency reliability.Exploratory factor analysis,criterion validity and discriminant validity were used to test the validity of the scale.Results The Cronbach's α of CES-D were 0.917 and 0.849 in case and control group,respectively.The corrected item-total correlations in suicides and controls were 0.255-0.815 and 0.168-0.684,respectively(both P0.01),suggesting the scale had good internal consistency reliability.Three factors were extracted by using exploratory factor analysis from 20 items(including affective and somatic symptoms,positive emotion,and interpersonal problems),which could explain 52.539% of total variance.In addition,69 samples were randomly sampled from the control informants.There were positive correlations between affective and somatic symptoms,positive emotion,CES-D and Beck Hopelessness Scale(BHS).The scale showed good criterion validity.There were 59 depressed subjects and 414 non-depressed subjects among the 473 informants.The scores of affective and somatic symptoms,positive emotion,interpersonal problems and CES-D were 17.44±5.86,9.00±4.51,0.88±1.68,and 27.32±9.05 in depression group,which were all higher than non-depression group(1.73±2.80,1.20±1.97,0.08±0.42,and 3.00±3.92),with significant differences between depression and non-depression group(all P0.001).The scale was proved having good discriminant validity.Conclusion CES-D has high reliability and validity and is applicable to assess depression in rural residents.