A Study of "Judge-Defendant Bargain" in Criminal Proceedings
SUN Chang-yong,WANG Biao
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1001-2397.2013.01.11
2013-01-01
Abstract:In criminal proceedings,judge-defendant is deemed an objective phenomenon, which,from the perspective of the court,can be divided into three categories: one based on suspicious facts, one on disputed laws and one on external factors.The judge with power and under pressure,the accused standing between passiveness and positivity,the prosecution serving as a bystander,and the ignorant orcompulsorily-compromisingvictim's rational choice all contribute to conclusion of the bargain.Judicial power's being subject to administrative operational patterns,unreasonable notion of genuineness in criminal proceedings,lack of alternatives for case solution and improper performance evaluation mechanism put great pressure upon the judge who has no way to release it but resort to bargain.While to some extent bargain between judge and the accusedhas been justified as of,it has lots of defects.To change the pressure-shirking judicial mode,lots of catalysts of judge-defendant bargainshould be restudied and relevant reform measures be taken.