Poetry of the Revolution: Marx, Manifestos, and the Avant-Gardes (review)
Matthew Rebhorn
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1353/MDR.2007.0059
2007-11-05
Abstract:The question of how art relates to politics has been staged a thousand times. A healthy question it is, as it shows no sign of abatement. Its life resides in a delicate balance between posing the question anew and posing it again. Within the framework of modernity, with its emphasis on making the self and the world, form reigns supreme. The language of form implies the art of making legible, tangible, and material that which is implicit all around us. As a genre, this work of negotiating aesthetic and worldly poesis is borne by the manifesto. That, at least, is Martin Puchner’s elegant formulation, one that he pursues with remarkable erudition and toward very productive ends. Puchner takes his title and lead from Marx’s genre-making text, the Communist Manifesto (1848), which teaches us that it is manifestos’ “form, not their particular complaints and demands, that articulates most succinctly the desires and hopes, maneuvers and strategies of modernity: to create points of no return; to make history; to fashion the future” (2).
Art,Philosophy,Political Science