Determining the Maximum Tolerable Concentration of Ropivacaine to Maintain Sensation of the Nerve Root in Percutaneous Endoscopic Transforaminal Lumbar Discectomy: Can Epidural Anaesthesia Achieve Pain-Tactile Separation Block to Avoid Nerve Injury?
Bingwei Hu,Xianhui Kang,Cheng Zhou,Jie Zhou,Weixing Xu,Weiguo Ding,Zhiying Feng,Hongwei Wang
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2147/dddt.s451980
IF: 4.3188
2024-06-19
Drug Design Development and Therapy
Abstract:Bingwei Hu, 1, &ast Xianhui Kang, 2, &ast Cheng Zhou, 1 Jie Zhou, 1 Weixing Xu, 3 Weiguo Ding, 3 Zhiying Feng, 4 Hongwei Wang 1 1 Department of Anaesthesiology, Tongde Hospital of Zhejiang Province, Hangzhou, People's Republic of China; 2 Department of Anaesthesiology, the First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, People's Republic of China; 3 Department of Spine Surgery, Tongde Hospital of Zhejiang Province, Hangzhou, People's Republic of China; 4 Department of of Pain Department, the First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, People's Republic of China &astThese authors contributed equally to this work Correspondence: Hongwei Wang; Zhiying Feng, Tongde Hospital of Zhejiang Province, Zhejiang Chinese Medical University, No. 234 Gucui Road, Xihu District, Hangzhou, People's Republic of China, Email ; Introduction: Nerve injury is a serious complication of percutaneous endoscopic transforaminal lumbar discectomy due to nerve root contact. The maximum tolerable concentration (MTC) of ropivacaine concentration for epidural anaesthesia, is defined as the concentration that minimises pain while preserving the sensation of the nerve roots. This distinct advantage allows the patient to provide feedback to the surgeon when the nerve roots are contacted. Methods: We used a biased-coin design to determine the MTC, which was estimated by the 10% effective concentration (EC 10 ), ie, the concentration at which 10% of patients lost sensation in the nerve roots. The determinant for positive response was lack of sensory feedback upon contact with the nerve root, and the feedback from occurrence of sensations in the innervation area upon contact with the nerve root was defined as a negative response. Primary outcome was the response from contact nerve root. Secondary outcomes were the type and number of statements of negative response and each patient's pain score during surgery. Results: Fifty-four patients were included in this study. The EC 10 was 0.434% (95% CI: 0.410%, 0.440%) using isotonic regression in comparison with 0.431% (95% CI: 0.399%, 0.444%) using probit regression. Three type statements of negative response were reported including "tactile sensation", radiculalgia, and numbness. Conclusion: The MTC of ropivacaine used for epidural anaesthesia was 0.434% to avoid nerve injury in percutaneous endoscopic transforaminal lumbar discectomy. Keywords: maximum tolerable concentration, epidural anaesthesia, transforaminal percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy, biased-coin design, isotonic regression Nerve injury is a complication of percutaneous endoscopic transforaminal lumbar discectomy (PELD) that results in a severe burden of disease. A previous study showed that the incidence was as high as 1.2% (5/426). 1 Local anaesthesia is recommended for PELD to avoid nerve injury because surgeons can predict nerve root injury according to feedback from the patients. 2,3 However, local anaesthesia could not relieve pain completely. Therefore, general anaesthesia was recommended by some surgeons to obtain perfect analgesic efficacy. 4 However, the loss of consciousness means that there is no feedback from nerve root contact. General anaesthesia was associated with a higher prevalence of nerve injury than local anaesthesia. 5 In one study, the incidence of postoperative complications related to nerve injury was 14.6% with general anaesthesia and 8.9% with epidural anaesthesia. 6 A good option to solve this problem is intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring. 7 Nevertheless, a systematic review showed that intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring did not reduce the incidence of neurological events. 8 Therefore, using intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring in general anaesthesia is more meaningful in complex operations, such as resection of spinal cord tumours. Anaesthesiologists have been searching for a better method that provides both feedback and sufficient analgesic efficacy to replace local anaesthesia. In recent years, some researchers have explored epidural anaesthesia with low concentrations of ropivacaine to achieve this goal. 9 Ropivacaine has the property of blocking sensory signals while preserving motor function. The concentration of 0.25%~0.375% had better analgesic efficacy in epidural anaesthesia than in local anaesthesia, 2,6,9,10 and nerve injury could be detected by observing the movement of the toes during the operation. 9,11,12 However, this method could not -Abstract Truncated-
pharmacology & pharmacy,chemistry, medicinal