Abstract:Three strictly comparable cross-section household dataset,related to 1988,1995 and 2001,are used to analyze the rapid yet unequal growth of wage and the sharp widening of wage structure.Earnings functions are compared and the increase in both the level and the inequality of wages are decomposed into their constituent elements.Distinctions are made between the variables likely to represent human capital,discrimination,and segmentation.The evidence suggests that productive characteristics were increasingly rewarded as marketization The Gini coefficient of earnings rose by 10.7 percentage points in the first phase from 1988 to 1995.Whereas the mean wage increased by 67 percent,the pay of the 10th percentile rose by only 22 percent,and that of the 90th percentile rose by 97 percent.These changes are much larger than those of the second phase from 1995 to 2001.Moreover,the returns to education rose sharply,as did the returns to occupation-specific skills.The initially slight inverse-U shape of the age-earnings profile became more pronounced: a change consistent with human capital theory.Thus the productive characteristics of workers were increasingly rewarded in the labor market.However,there were also signs of greater wage discrimination against women.Moreover,the market forces operating in the growing private sector and the relative immunity of the state sector from those forces generated greater wage segmentation among types of ownership,and provincial differences in the pace of reform and in economic growth created spatial segmentation in wages that could not be removed by the equilibrating movement of labor.Decomposition analyses were conducted in order to examine the contribution of particular characteristics to the rise in the Gini coefficient.Only a third of earnings inequality and its increase could be explained: the unobserved determinants are clearly important to the increase in earnings dispersion.The discrimination variables accounted for only a small part of the increase.The segmentation variables made the most important contribution,and that was mainly due to growing wage dispersion among provinces.This result is supported by other evidence of powerful divergence in mean earnings among provinces(Knight,Li and Zhao,2001).Some but not all components of human capital were disequalizing.These particular changes are likely to represent the stirring of labor market forces.

Causes and Dynamics of Persistent Inequality:A Review

The Causes of Persistent Inequality and Its Enlightenment to China

Dynamics of Income and Wealth Distribution in a Neoclassical Growth Model

The Dynamics of Disparity: A Comprehensive Analysis of the Causes and Consequences of Income and Wealth Inequality and Policy Interventions for Mitigation

Emergence of income inequality: Origin, distribution and possible policies

Dynamics of Persistent Inequality of Wealth in a Life-Cycle Model with Bequest

Marketization and Unequal Growth of Wage: Their Extent and Influence Factors

Dynamics of Wealth Inequality

Political Economy of Income Distribution Dynamics

Financial Development,Income Distribution and Economic Growth

Dynamics of Wealth Inequality in Simple Artificial Societies

The dynamic socioecological model of economic inequality and psychological tendencies: A cycle of mutual constitution

Endowment,Resource Allocation,Educational Expansion and Educational Equality:A Review of Empirical Studies on the Determinants of Educational Inequality

Emergent Statistical Wealth Distributions in Simple Monetary Exchange Models: A Critical Review

Development and inequality: A long‐run view

Does the environmental inequality matter? A literature review

Changes in Household Income Inequality in China:Short-term Variation and Long-term Trend

Caste, class, race, and inequality: insights for economic policy

Persistent Heterogeneous Returns and Top End Wealth Inequality

The Increasing Inequality of Wealth in China

Rising Income Inequalities – the Causes of and Consequences for Long-term Growth