Performance Impact of Technological Assets and Configuration Capabilities:An Empirical Research of Chinese New Ventures

Jiang Chunyan

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1008-3448.2008.02.013

2008-01-01

Abstract:The purpose of this study is to investigate the rela-tionships between firm resources and performance. We divide firm resources into two types: primary resources and sup-port resources. Primary resources include technological as-sets and configuration capabilities,which directly contribute to a firm’s competitive advantage. Support resources include internal human capital,inter-firm collaboration,and manage-rial vision,which contribute to the development of primary resources. Using a sample of 548 new ventures in China,our analysis revealed that both technological assets and configura-tion capabilities significantly enhanced firm performance that the firms with superior technological assets tended to posses superior configuration capabilities,and that most of the sup-port resources significantly contributed to the development of both technological assets and configuration capabilities,spe-cifically,both internal human capital and inter-firm collabora-tion greatly improved firms’ technological assets; both inter-firm collaboration and managerial vision have heavy impact on firms’ configuration capabilities. The present study makes several contributions to the resource-based view of the firm (RBV) literature. First,we conceptually distinguished between technological assets and configuration capabilities and empiri-cally examined their impact on performance,which clearly suggest that the "using" decision was even more important than the "owing" decision. Secondly,we examined the systematic relationships between primary and support resources,which suggest that primary and support resources work dynamically in a complementary manner to develop a firm’s competitive advantage. Thirdly,we empirically addressed all the relation-ships in a large sample of Chinese new ventures. Practically,the present study has two implications for managers. First,the evidence suggests that the impact of configuration capabilities on performance is even greater than that of technological assets although both have substantial positive performance effects. Secondly,the evidence suggests that inter-firm collaboration is a very effective means of developing configuration capabilities and is substantially superior to internal development.