Comparison between Two Methods for Determination of Arsenic in Urine

薛鹏,富景奇,徐苑苑,贺淼,孙贵范,金亚平
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1001-5914.2008.07.019
2008-01-01
Abstract:Objective To verify the reliability and feasibility of two methods by making comparison between hydride generation-cold trap-atomic absorption spectrometry (HG-cold trap-AAS) and high performance liquid chromatography-hydride generation-atomic fluorescence spectrometry (HPLC-HG-AFS) for determination of arsenicals. Methods 15 Urine samples of residents exposed to 240 μg/L inorganic arsenic in drinking water were collected from chronic endemic arsenism areas in Tuo county,Inner Mongolia,China,Nov. 2006. For the analysis of arsenic contents,valence state and speciation of urine,the HG-cold trap-AAS system and the HPLC-HG-AFS system were used. The statistical analysis for the determination with two methods was depended on the paired-samples t test. Results The scope of the total arsenic contents (tAs) for the two methods were 180.75-1 644.98 μg/L (HG-cold trap-AAS) and 179.32-1 579.24 μg/L (HPLC-HG-AFS),and for all the samples,there was no significance of difference between two methods (t=0.56,P>0.5),for the samples in which tAs was over 500 μg/L,there was extremely significance of difference between two methods (t=2.70,P<0.05); for the MMA (monomethylarsonic acid) determination,there was extremely significance of difference between two methods in all the samples (t=3.85,P<0.05); for all the samples,there was no significance of difference for the contents of iAs (inorganic arsenic) and DMA (dimethylarsinic acid) between two methods; the contents of TMAO (trimethylarsine oxide) were not determined for all the samples. Conclusion Both of HG-cold trap-AAS method and HPLC-HG-AFS method can be efficiently used for the different arsenicals determination in urine,but for the determination of high concentration arsenicals in urine,the HG-cold trap-AAS method may be a better choice.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?