Equivalent Hydrogen Fugacity during Electrochemical Charging of 980DP Steel Determined by Thermal Desorption Spectroscopy
Qinglong Liu,Evan Gray,Jeffrey Venezuela,Qingjun Zhou,Clotario Tapia-Bastidas,Mingxing Zhang,Andrej Atrens
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/adem.201700469
IF: 3.6
2017-09-07
Advanced Engineering Materials
Abstract:Thermal desorption spectroscopy (TDS) is used to analyze hydrogen in 980DP after (i) electrochemical charging, and (ii) gaseous charging. The hydrogen concentration increases with (i) a more negative charging potential and (ii) an increasing hydrogen gas pressure. For charging in 0.1 M NaOH, the hydrogen fugacity for 980DP is similar to that for (i) low interstitial steel, and (ii) MS1500, and is greater than that for the 3.5NiCrMoV steel. This indicates an influence of steel chemistry on the hydrogen evolution reaction. The de‐trapping activation energies are 40.5 and 50.2 kJ mol−1, indicating hydrogen traps at boundary defects. The figure shows that, for cathodic hydrogen charging in 0.1 M NaOH, the hydrogen fugacity is similar for the (i) 980DP steel (ii) low interstitial steel, and (iii) MS1500, and was greater than the fugacity for the 3.5NiCrMoV steel. This indicates an influence of steel chemistry, most likely, on the details of the hydrogen evolution reaction.
materials science, multidisciplinary