On the First Factor of the Class Number of a Cyclotomic Field

KQ FENG
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2044019
IF: 0.9709
1982-01-01
Proceedings of the American Mathematical Society
Abstract:Let p p be an odd prime. h 1 ( p ) {h_1}(p) is the first factor of the class number of field Q ( ζ p ) Q({\zeta _p}) . We proved that \[ h 1 ( p ) ⩽ { 2 p ( p − 1 8 ( 2 l / 2 + 1 ) 4 / l ) ( p − 1 ) / 4 , if l is even, 2 p ( p − 1 8 ( 2 l − 1 ) 2 / l ) ( p − 1 ) / 4 , if l is odd . {h_1}(p) \leqslant \left \{ \begin {gathered} 2p{\left ( {\frac {{p - 1}} {{8{{({2^{l/2}} + 1)}^{4/l}}}}} \right )^{(p - 1)/4}},\quad {\text {if }}l\;{\text {is even,}} \hfill \\ 2p{\left ( {\frac {{p - 1}} {{8{{({2^l} - 1)}^{2/l}}}}} \right )^{(p - 1)/4}},\quad {\text {if }}l\;{\text {is odd}}{\text {.}} \hfill \\ \end {gathered} \right . \] From that we obtain h 1 ( p ) ⩽ 2 p ( ( p − 1 ) / 31.997158 … ) ( p − 1 ) / 4 {h_1}(p) \leqslant 2p{((p - 1)/31.997158 \ldots )^{(p - 1)/4}} which is better than Carlitz’s and Metsänkyla’s results. For the fields Q ( ζ 2 n ) Q({\zeta _{{2^n}}}) and Q ( ζ p n ) ( n ⩾ 2 ) Q({\zeta _{{p^n}}})(n \geqslant 2) , we get the similar results.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?