Abstract:Abstract Platform enterprises, which aggregate numerous and scattered resources, connect multiple interdependent parties and facilitate interactions and transactions, also confront significant monopoly market challenges. These issues constrain the platform economy’s healthy development and severely disrupt the normal market order. This paper constructs a tripartite evolutionary game model comprising the government, platform enterprises, and users, to investigate the governance mechanisms of monopoly behavior in platform enterprises and employs Matlab for numerical simulation. The results indicate that government rewards, additional profits, monopoly penalties, and user collaboration positively impact the evolution of platform enterprise strategies toward non-monopolistic practices. Together, these four mechanisms constitute the governance mechanism for monopoly behavior in platform enterprises. Specifically, providing honorary rewards for non-monopolistic behavior in platform enterprises over a certain period is essential, as it represents an effective means for the government to encourage innovative development in internet platform enterprises. The profit mechanism is the main driving force behind platform enterprises adopting monopolistic strategies and facilitating their survival and development. To a certain extent, the penalty mechanism can suppress monopolistic behaviors in platform enterprises, but it cannot fundamentally eliminate them. Instead, this mechanism accelerates the evolution of platform enterprises towards non-monopolistic behaviors, marking it as a positive governance tool. The user collaboration mechanism, a form of collaborative governance, serves as a beneficial complement to the reward, penalty, and profit mechanisms. This is because users primarily engage with platforms as consumers, legally entitled to services, and their regulatory role constitutes only a part of their responsibilities, not the main economic activity on digital platforms.

Study on the Formation and Governance Mechanism of Administrative Monopoly

Nation and Governance——Government Monopoly on the Market in China's History and Its Political Cause

Perfecting the Separating Power System in Property Right Reform

GOVERNING CHINA’S ADMINISTRATIVE MONOPOLIES UNDER THE ANTI-MONOPOLY LAW: A TEN-YEAR REVIEW (2008–2018) AND BEYOND

Administrative Monopoly and the Anti-Monopoly Law: an examination of the debate in China

Problems and Reform Strategies in Distribution of Administrative Power of Universities in Our Country

How Far is to Be Administrating Legally--Administrative Mechanism Reformation to Eliminate the Administrative Monopoly

Administrative Monopoly in China's Natural Monopoly Industries and Its Regulatory Policy

A Study on Promoting the Intensive Use of Industrial Land in China Through Governance: A Game Theoretical Approach

Research on the Governance form Mechanism of Platform Enterprise Monopoly Behavior Based on Evolutionary Game Theory

On Administrative Monopoly

The Influence of Administrative Monopoly on Economic Development——An Empirical Study Based on Vector Error Correction Model

Evaluation and Analysis of Administrative Monopoly in China's Oil Industry

Games Between Local Governments in Regional Industrial Transfer

Local Government Competition and Centralised Urban Growth Management Policy Implementation: Evidence from China

The Administrative Monopoly in China’s Economic Transition

Estimation of Administrative Monopoly in Toll Road Industry and Corresponding Eliminating Strategies

Structural restraints and institutional innovation in local governance: a case study of administrative examination and approval system reforms in Shunde, Ningbo, and Taizhou

Administrative monopoly regulation and corporate tax avoidance - evidence from China

Administrative monopoly and state-owned enterprise innovation: Evidence from the fair competition review system in China