Abstract:Research highlights ▶ Values of ρ 0 at4.2 K for multi-principal-element alloys C- x , H- x , and D- x are 111.06–196.49, 93.78–162.77, and 120.48–162.05 μΩ cm, respectively. With the same level of carrier density, they are larger than those of conventional alloys, but smaller than those of amorphous ones. RRR values range from 1.03 to 1.27. That is, the electronic transportation in the studied alloy system is dominated by the defects of lattice. These facts imply that the degree of defects in a single lattice for these high-entropy alloys is lower than for amorphous ones, but larger than conventional ones. The TCR value of H-2.00 listed is small (82.5 ppm/K). From the ρ 0 ( T ) fitting, it is demonstrated that the Kondo-like behavior exists for some compositions. ▶ BCC phase has high M s value at low temperature in this alloy system. At 300 K, alloys H-0.50, H-1.25, and H-2.00 are ferromagnetic, while alloys H-0.00, H-0.25, and H-0.75 are paramagnetic. Al and AlNi-rich phases decreases ferromagnetism for single FCC and single BCC alloys H- x , respectively. The spin glass behavior is observed for some compositions of this study. ▶ Alloys H- x are of the hole-like carrier type. The stronger the ferromagnetic alloys the higher the % AHE , i.e., the anomalous Hall effect (AHE) is magnetic dependent. Carrier density for H- x (10 22–23 cm −3 ) is similar to that for conventional alloys. Alloys H- x have small carrier mobility (0.40–2.61 cm 2 V −1 s −1 ). It is associated with the heavier lattice defects of HEAs as compared to the conventional alloys with the same carrier density. Abstract This investigation explores the electrical and magnetic properties of as-cast, -homogenized, and -deformed Al x CoCrFeNi (C- x , H- x , and D- x , respectively) alloys at various temperatures from 4.2 to 300 K. Experimental results reveal that carrier density of the alloys is of 10 22–23 cm −3 . H- x has a carrier mobility of 0.40–2.61 cm 2 V −1 s −1 . The residual electrical resistivity of the alloys varies from 100 to 220 μΩ cm. The temperature coefficient of resistivity (TCR) of H-2.00 is small (82.5 ppm/K). Therefore, defects in the lattice dominate electrical transportation. Some compositions exhibit Kondo-like behavior. At 300 K, H-0.50, H-1.25, and H-2.00 are ferromagnetic, while H-0.00, H-0.25, and H-0.75 are paramagnetic. Al and AlNi-rich phases reduce the ferromagnetism of single FCC and single BCC H- x , respectively. Spin glass behavior of some compositions is also observed. Alloys H- x are of the hole-like carrier type, and ferromagnetic H- x exhibits an anomalous Hall effect (AHE). Keywords Bulk Al x CoCrFeNi alloys Cast Homogenization Plastic deformation Melt-spinning Electrical resistivity Hall effect Carrier density Carrier mobility Magnetic property Kondo-like effect Lattice defects 1 Introduction The first study on high-entropy alloys (HEAs) was published in 1996 [1] . Today, research into HEAs addresses their mechanical, anticorrosion, hydrogen storage [2] , and thermophysical [3] properties, among others. Relevant results demonstrate that HEAs have simple microstructures in the form of a solid solution of multiple elements [4–6] , a favorable capacity to form nano-scale precipitates [5,7] , high thermal stability [8] , superior extensive or compressive properties [9] , extremely high hardness [10] , excellent anticorrosive properties [11,12] , and special thermophysical and magnetic properties [3] . The crystallinity of HEAs is commonly simple, even though they are comprised more than five elements. The simple crystal lattices exhibit both the individual characteristics of their constituents and collective characteristics. For example, they exhibit the collective mechanical and thermal properties of a solid solution, but the anticorrosion performance of its individual constituent elements. Understanding the physical properties, including electrical, magnetic, and thermal properties, of HEAs can help in understanding their lattice. The magnetic property of CoCrCuFeNiTi x alloys [13] has been studied. The FCC solid solutions that comprise in CoCrCuFeNi and CoCrCuFeNiTi 0.5 alloys exhibit typical paramagnetism, whereas CoCrCuFeNiTi 0.8 and CoCrCuFeNiTi alloys exhibit superparamagnetism, which is attributable to the embedding of nanoparticle assemblies in the amorphous phase with the addition of Ti. Al x CoCrFeNi alloys have been widely studied to elucidate their microstructural and mechanical [4] , anticorrosive [11] , and thermally expansive [3] properties. However, their electrical and magnetic properties are still not fully understood. This investigation, which extends another, [4] , aims to study the electrical and magnetic properties of Al x CoCrFeNi alloys by measuring resistivity, magnetization, and the Hall effect. The values of the relevant parameters obtained using these three methods will be compared with each other, to provide insight into the physical properties of Al x CoCrFeNi alloys. 2 Experimental details A total of 40–50 g of Al, Co, Cr, Fe, and Ni with purities of greater than 99.5% was used to prepare Al x CoCrFeNi (0 ≤ x ≤ 2) alloys using a vacuum arc-remelter. After the alloys were re-melted, they were turned over and the process was repeated at least three times to ensure that the alloys were completely mixed. As-cast alloys were heated to 1100 °C at 20 °C per min and held at that temperature for 24 h. The samples were then quenched in water. These heated and quenched samples are called as-homogenized ones herein, except where otherwise specified. The as-homogenized samples were cold-deformed by a DBR250 two-high rolling mill to reduce their thickness by 75%. Cracks appeared in the samples with molar ratios of Al of more than 0.875 ( x > 0.875) because they had high hardness. Therefore, the as-deformed samples were those with 0 ≤ x ≤ 0.875 in this investigation. Here, C- x , H- x , and D- x represent as-cast, -homogenized, and -deformed Al x CoCrFeNi (0 ≤ x ≤ 2) alloys, respectively. Melt-spun samples with x = 0.25, M-0.25, were also prepared and their resistivity was measured and compared. The samples were cut using a diamond cutter into pieces with a thickness of 2 mm, and then ground to a thickness of less than 500 μm, using smaller-number sandpaper, to enable their resistivity to be measured. An EG & G Model 5210 Dual Phase Lock-in Amplifier was used to measure the resistance by the four-point probe method. To measure the resistivity of the samples at low temperatures, the samples were gradually sunk into liquid helium in a Dewar flask, and their resistance was continuously measured between 300 and 4.2 K. A superconducting quantum interference device magnetometer MPMS5 (SQUID), from American Quantum Design, was used to measure the magnetic properties of the samples, including the hysteresis loop ( M – H curve) and the magnetization vs. temperature curve ( M – T curve). The two states in which the M – T curves were measured were the zero-field cooling (ZFC) and field cooling (FC) ones. The hysteresis loops were measured at 300, 50, and 5 K. The M – T curves of 5–150 K were measured in a magnetic field of 100 Oe. The manipulating current that was used to measure the Hall effect was 10 mA; the applied magnetic field was up to ±9 T, and the temperature range was 5–300 K. 3 Results and discussion 3.1 Microstructure of alloys C- x , H- x , D- x , 900 °C-homogenized H-0.25, and M-0.25 As shown in Fig. 1 , the structures of the alloys C- x , H- x , and D- x , (with increasing amount of Al, given by x ) are single FCC, duplex FCC–BCC, and single BCC, respectively. Al is a BCC stabilizer in Al x CoCrFeNi alloys. The ranges of x in which the alloys C- x , H- x , and D- x are in a duplex phase are 0.45 ≤ x ≤ 0.88, 0.30 ≤ x ≤ 1.17, and 0.30 ≤ x ≤ 0.875, respectively [4] . Alloys 900 °C-homogenized-H-0.25 and M-0.25 comprise duplex FCC-AlNi-rich precipitate BCC and single FCC, respectively. 3.2 Electrical properties 3.2.1 Highly concentrated point defects in lattice of HEAs Fig. 2 (a)–(c) presents resistivity data for alloys C- x , H- x ( x = 0–2.00), and D- x ′ ( x ′ = 0–0.875), respectively, from 4.2 to 300 K. Table 1 lists the resistivity at 4.2 K ( ρ 0 ), resistivity at 300 K ( ρ 300 ), residual resistivity ratio (RRR), defined as ρ 0 / ρ 300 , and temperature coefficient of resistivity (TCR) defined as ( ρ 300 − ρ 150 )/[ ρ 150 (300 − 150)]. Studies [4,14] have shown that Al is a strong BCC former and can promote atomic bonding in high-entropy alloys (HEAs). Therefore, the mechanical property [15] , wear behavior [16] , and anti-corrosion ability [17] are closely related to the Al content. However, no linear relationship between resistivity and x is observed in Fig. 2 (a)–(c), indicating that the microstructure is not the only factor that affects the electrical resistivity of this alloy system. The ranges of the ρ 0 values of alloys C- x , H- x , and D- x are 111.06–196.49, 93.78–162.77, and 120.48–162.05 μΩ cm, respectively. The ρ 0 values of amorphous AlCoCrCu 0.5 FeNi [18] and Nd–Fe–B [19] alloys are 289 and 250 μΩ cm, respectively; the ρ 0 values of crystallized ternary Ni 75 Fe 17 Cr 8 , Ni 75 Fe 13 Cr 12 , and Ni 68 Fe 17.5 Cr 14.5 alloys are 58.1, 89.6, and 92.4 μΩ cm, respectively [20] . The ρ 0 values of the quinary alloys of interest herein exceed those of the aforementioned traditional crystalline alloys, but are less than those of amorphous alloys. Electron transportation is usually associated with the ‘orderliness’ of a lattice. The above discussion suggests that the orderliness of the lattices of the studied alloys is between that of an ordered structure (traditional crystalline alloys) and that of a disordered structure (amorphous alloy). HEAs exhibit long-range order but seemingly less degree short-range order in the sense of a single lattice. With respect to electronic conduction, quinary HEAs are metallic (see below) but have highly-concentrated point defects, resulting from multi-principal elements in a pseudo-unitary lattice (PUL) cell. The RRR values range from 1.03 to 1.27, as indicated in Table 1 . Accordingly, electronic transportation in the alloys of interest is dominated by the defects from 4.2 to 300 K, the defects in the lattice of alloys dominate electronic transportation therein. Additionally, the TCR value of H- x in Table 1 is low (82.5 ppm/K), because of the lesser orderliness of each lattice. 3.2.2 Resistivity of alloys FCC C-0.25, H-0.25, and D-0.25 Fig. 2 (d) plots data on the resistivity of alloys C-0.25, H-0.25 (900 and 1100 °C), D-0.25 (50% and 75% reductions) and M-0.25 from 4.2 to 300 K. Fig. 3 reveals that the ρ 0 values increase in the order 1100 °C-homogenized H-0.25, C-0.25, 50% reduction-D-0.25, 75% reduction-D-0.25, M-0.25, and 900 °C-homogenized H-0.25. Greater deformation or a higher quenching/cooling rate corresponds to more introduced defects, and higher ρ 0 values. The 900 °C-homogenized H-0.25 has a relatively high ρ 0 . This is associated with a small amount of BCC AlNi-rich precipitate [21] . Additionally, the ρ 0 of D-0.25 after 75% cold deformation slightly exceeds that of D-0.25 after 50% cold deformation. 3.2.3 Kondo-like behavior The dependence of resistivity of temperature is not simple, because it usually involves several effects over several temperature ranges. Conduction electrons usually interact with phonons at high temperatures, such as 300–1000 K, and the dependence in this temperature range is ρ ∝ T [20,22,23] . Conduction electrons usually interact with magnetic atoms in the alloys at intermediate temperatures, such as 100–300 K, and ρ ∝ T 2 . When the temperature declines to 0–50 K, phonon ( T 3 ), magnetic ( T 2 ), and electron–electron interaction ( T 1/2 ) effects occur simultaneously [20] . Hence, suitable temperature ranges must be carefully selected to study the influence of temperature on the effects of all of the above phenomena. Experiments have shown two typical features of electrical conductivity at low temperatures. They are residual resistivity (equal to ρ 0, as described in Section 3.2 .) and the Kondo effect [24] . Residual resistivity is the resistivity that is caused by the scattering of electron waves by static defects that disturb the periodicity of the lattice [22] . According to Matthiessen's rule, the net resistivity is given by ρ = ρ L + ρ i , where ρ L represents the resistivity that is caused by the thermal phonons, and ρ i is the residual resistivity. Therefore, ρ i (0) is the extrapolated resistivity to 0 K because ρ L is commonly independent of the number of defects when the defect concentration is weak, and is usually proportional to the temperature. Therefore, ρ L vanishes as T approaches 0 K. The Kondo effect, however, vanishes at high temperatures, but localized spin fluctuation and RKKY interaction [22] increase resistivity at low temperatures. The Kondo effect commonly arises in dilute alloy systems. Although HEAs are not dilute, they exhibit a Kondo-like behavior, which will be discussed in the following section. In Fig. 2 (a)–(c), two formulae are applied to fit ρ ( T ). At low temperatures (4.2–66 K), ρ = ρ 0 + A ln( T ) + BT 2 + CT 3 is used to model Kondo-like ( A ), magnetic ( B ), and low-temperature phonon ( C ) effects. At intermediate temperatures (100–300 K), the fitting formula, ρ = ρ 0 + BT 2 + DT , where B and D are the coefficients of magnetic and phonon effects, respectively, is utilized. The Kondo-like effect is usually considered [25] to be proportional to lnT at low temperatures, such that Δ ρ / ρ min ∝ ln T . Tables 2 and 3 display the results of fitting. Alloys C- x ( x = 0.25–0.50, and 2.00), H- x ( x = 0.25-2), and D-0.375 exhibit Kondo-like behavior. At low temperatures, B is clearly one to two orders of magnitude higher than at intermediate temperatures. A is always negative in Kondo-like samples, and larger absolute values of A are associated with a stronger Kondo-like effect, especially in H-2.00. The magnetic contribution, T 2 , competes with the Kondo-like effect. When the magnetic contribution greatly exceeds the Kondo-like effect, resistivity remains constant with a change in temperature and levels off at low temperatures. The Kondo-like and the magnetic effects in H- x slightly increase with temperature at low temperatures, but the magnetic and phonon effects decrease with increasing temperature at intermediate temperatures . Evaluating the phonon effect at low temperatures, T 3 , is difficult, because it is extremely small and frequently mixed with a magnetic effect, T 2 [20] . 3.3 Magnetic properties of alloys H- x Fig. 4 (a)–(f) plot SQUID data for alloys H- x , respectively, at 5, 50, and 300 K. Table 4 presents the related magnetic parameters of alloys H- x . In the next two sections, most of the factors that are related to the magnetic property of alloys H- x , are associated with (i) the crystal structure and (ii) the Al or AlNi-rich phase. First, the results that are explained by the crystal structure are discussed. Table 4 reveals that all H- x alloys are ferromagnetic at low temperatures (5 and 50 K). Additionally, the saturation magnetization ( M s ) of alloys H-1.25 and H-2.00 exceeds that of alloys H-0 and H-0.25, indicating that at low temperatures, the BCC phase has a higher M s value than the FCC phase. At room temperature (300 K), alloys H-0.50, H-1.25, and H-2.00 remain ferromagnetic, while alloys H-0, H-0.25, and H-0.75 are paramagnetic. The estimated Curie temperatures ( T C ) are taken from the curves of the reciprocal of magnetic susceptibility ( χ −1 ) against temperature. Table 4 shows no regular relationship between T C and x for alloys H-0, H-0.25, and H-0.50. Next, M s , to which both BCC and FCC phases contribute, is estimated when 0.5 ≤ x ≤ 0.75. The M s of the two phases at 5 K can be calculated numerically as follows: (1) M s = X FCC M s , FCC + X BCC M s , BCC where X FCC , M s,FCC , X BCC , and M s,BCC are the volume fraction of FCC, the saturation magnetization of FCC, the volume fraction of BCC, and the saturation magnetization of BCC, respectively. However, X FCC and X BCC can be obtained from the fitting of hardness [4] . Therefore, the above equation can be rewritten as, (2) 140.11 = 0.7551 M s , FCC + 0.2449 M s , BCC ( for H- 0.50 ) (3) 119.93 = 0.5765 M s , FCC + 0.4235 M s , BCC ( for H- 0.75 ) Accordingly, M s,FCC = 167.78 (emu cm −3 ) and M s,BCC = 54.79 (emu cm −3 ). The reason for the result M s,BCC < M s,FCC is ascribed to the existence of Al or AlNi-rich phase as discussed further in the following paragraph. The results for which the Al or AlNi-rich phase are responsible is discussed. The M s value declines as x increases in the ranges 0 ≤ x ≤ 0.25 and 1.25 ≤ x ≤ 2.00, as indicated in Table 4 . The M s and magnetic susceptibility ( χ −1 ) values of alloy H-0 are smaller than those of alloy H-0.25, implying that Al reduces the ferromagnetism of the FCC phase alloys (0 ≤ x ≤ 0.25). According to a study of Alnico magnets [26] , the AlNi-rich phase exhibits weak ferromagnetism. In one study [4] , H-2.00 contained an AlNi-rich ordered BCC phase. Hence, the fact that the M s value of H-2.00 is smaller than that of H-1.25, which has no AlNi-rich ordered BCC phase, is unsurprising. In summary, Al reduces the ferromagnetism of single-FCC and single-BCC alloys H- x , by forming Al and AlNi-rich phases, respectively. In Fig. 5 (a)–(b) and (d)–(f), the maximum magnetization can be observed at 5–40 K. This reentrant spin glass behavior occurs at the freezing transition point ( T f ) at which electronic spins are frozen. 3.4 Hall effect of alloys H- x The Hall effect measurements are made in alloys H-0.25 (FCC), H-0.50 (duplex), H-0.75 (duplex), H-1.00 (duplex), and H-1.25 (BCC). Fig. 6 (a)–(b) present data on the Hall resistivity ( ρ H ) of the H- x samples at 5 and 300 K, respectively. Table 5 presents the related parameters. Both the ordinary Hall effect (OHE) and the anomalous Hall effect (AHE) can be observed because of the ferromagnetism of the samples. Fig. 6 plots Hall resistivity ( ρ H ) against magnetic field at 5 and 300 K, and reveals an obvious covariation of AHE and OHE. For alloys H-0.25 and H-0.75, at temperatures above the Curie temperature (300 K), only OHE occurs, while at temperatures below the Curie temperature (5 K), AHE clearly occurs. For H-1.25, the Curie temperature exceeds 300 K, and the curve at 300 K is shifted from that of 5 K since the magnetization is lower at 300 K. For AHE, the Hall resistivity ρ H can be expressed as, (4) ρ H = R 0 B + 4 π M s R s where R 0 is the ordinary Hall coefficient; B is the magnetic induction; M s is the saturation magnetization, and R s is the anomalous Hall coefficient. R 0 B is the Lorentz force that acts on the conduction electrons, and the second term is attributable to the spin-orbit interaction [27–29] in a ferromagnet. The values of R s M s and R 0 are obtained from the intercept and the slope, respectively, and the related fitting results are listed in Table 6 . Notably, the M s values of the samples are obtained from the SQUID data in Section 3.3 . Only the ferromagnetic samples yield R s values in Table 6 , revealing that AHE dominates in ferromagnetic materials. Additionally, values of R s at 5 K are close to those at 300 K, and this result shows that R s is almost independent of temperature. Graphical analysis yields % of OHE and % of AHE, % OHE and % AHE , can be obtained. The relevant equations are as follows: (5) % OHE = R 0 B / ( R 0 B + 4 π M s R s ) (6) % AHE = 1 − % OHE Table 6 presents % OHE and % AHE at 9 T. Clearly, % OHE exceeds % AHE at 300 K because H- x exhibits weaker ferromagnetism at 300 K than at 5 K. The % AHE at 5 K is approximately equal to the saturation magnetization, M s , at 5 K in Table 6 . Samples with higher M s , especially H-1.25, have higher % AHE , indicating that more strongly ferromagnetic samples have higher % AHE , and so % AHE depends on the magnetism. The results in Fig. 6 support this conclusion. The Hall resistivity of alloys H- x is positive, as shown in Fig. 6 . These alloys are similar to Glassy TE-TL alloys [30] . The carriers in these samples are hole-like, although in some cases, the carriers are electron-like [31] . Based on ρ H and ρ (the resistivity data in Section 3.2 .), the related parameters of the Hall effect, presented in Table 5 , can be obtained. The carrier density in a high-entropy alloy system H- x (10 22–23 cm −3 ) is similar to that in conventional alloys. However, the H- x high-entropy alloy system has lower carrier mobility (0.40–2.61 cm 2 V −1 s −1 ) than conventional alloys with the same carrier density, because HEAs have heavier lattice defects than conventional alloys. This explanation warrants further study. 4 Conclusions The values of ρ 0 at 4⋅2 K for alloys C- x , H- x , and D- x are 111.06–196.49, 93.78–162.77, and 120.48–162.05 μΩ cm, respectively. They are larger than those of conventional alloys with the same carrier density, but smaller than those of amorphous alloys. The RRR values range from 1.03 to 1.27. Therefore, the defects in the lattice dominate the electronic transportation in the studied alloy system. These facts imply that the density of defects in a single lattice in these high-entropy alloys is less than in amorphous alloys, but greater than in conventional alloys. The presented TCR value of H-2.00 is small (82.5 ppm/K). The fitted ρ ( T ) reveals that some compositions exhibit Kondo-like behavior. The single BCC structure in the alloy system has a high M s value at low temperatures. At 300 K, alloys H-0.50, H-1.25, and H-2.00 are ferromagnetic, while alloys H-0.00, H-0.25, and H-0.75 are paramagnetic. Al and AlNi-rich phases reduce the ferromagnetism of single FCC and single BCC H- x alloys, respectively. Some of the compositions of interest in this investigation exhibit spin glass behavior. Alloys H- x are of the hole-like carrier type. More strongly ferromagnetic alloys have higher % AHE , and an anomalous Hall effect (AHE) that depends more strongly on magnetism. The carrier density of H- x (10 22–23 cm −3 ) is similar to that of conventional alloys. Alloys H- x have a low carrier mobility (0.40–2.61 cm 2 V −1 s −1 ), which is associated with the heavier lattice defects of HEAs than of the conventional alloys with the same carrier density. Acknowledgement SKC would like to thank the financial support of this research from the National Science Council of the Republic of China, Taiwan , under the Contract No. NSC96-2221-E007-066-MY3. Ted Knoy is appreciated for his editorial assistance. References [1] K.H. Huang, A Study on the Multicomponent Alloy Systems Containing Equal-mole Elements, M.S. thesis, Department of Material Science and Engineering, NTHU, Taiwan, 1996. [2] Y.F. Kao S.K. Chen J.H. Sheu J.T. Lin W.E. Lin J.W. Yeh S.J. Lin T.H. Liou C.W. Wang Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 35 2010 9046 9059 [3] H.P. Chou Y.S. Chang S.K. Chen J.W. Yeh Mater. Sci. Eng. B163 2009 184 189 [4] Y.F. Kao T.J. Chen S.K. Chen J.W. Yeh J. Alloys Compd. 52 2009 1026 1034 [5] C.J. Tong Y.L. Chen S.K. Chen J.W. Yeh T.T. Shun C.H. Tsai S.J. Lin S.Y. Chang Metal. Mater. Trans. A36 2005 881 893 [6] J.W. Yeh Ann. Chim. Sci. Mater. 31 2006 633 648 [7] J.W. Yeh S.K. Chen S.J. Lin J.Y. Gan T.S. Chin T.T. Shun C.H. Tsau S.Y. Chang Adv. Eng. Mater. 6 2004 299 303 [8] S. Varalakshmi M. Kamaraj B.S. Murty Mater. Sci. Eng. A527 2010 1027 1030 [9] Y.J. Zhou Y. Zhang Y.L. Wang G.L. Chen Appl. Phys. Lett. 90 2007 181904 181906 [10] K.C. Hsieh C.F. Yu W.T. Hsieh W.R. Chiang J.S. Ku J.H. Lai C.P. Tu C.C. Yang J. Alloys Compd. 483 2009 209 212 [11] Y.F. Kao T.D. Lee S.K. Chen Y.S. Chang Corros. Sci. 52 2010 1026 1034 [12] Y.Y. Chen U.T. Hong H.C. Shih J.W. Yeh T. Duval Corros. Sci. 47 2005 2679 2699 [13] X.F. Wang Y. Zhang Y. Qiao G.L. Chen Intermetallics 15 2007 357 362 [14] W.Y. Tang J.W. Yeh Metall. Mater. Trans. A 40 2009 1479 1486 [15] S.T. Chen W.Y. Tang Y.F. Kuo S.Y. Chen C.H. Tsau T.T. Shun J.W. Yeh Mater. Sci. Eng. A 527 2010 5818 5825 [16] J.M. Wu S.J. Lin J.W. Yeh S.K. Chen Y.S. Huang H.C. Chen Wear 261 2006 513 519 [17] C.P. Lee C.C. Chang Y.Y. Chen J.W. Yeh H.C. Shih Corrs. Sci. 50 2008 2053 2060 [18] M.H. Cai, Study on the Microstructure and Electrical Properties Evolution of High-Entropy Alloy Thin Films, M.S. thesis, Department of Material Science and Engineering, NTHU, Taiwan, 2003. [19] T. Saito J. Alloys Compd. 505 2009 23 28 [20] S. Chakraborty A.K. Majumdar J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 186 1998 357 372 [21] A.A. Al-Aql Mater. Des. 24 2003 547 550 [22] C. Kittel Introduction to Solid State Physics 8th ed. 2005 Wiley New York [23] P.J. Cote L.V. Meisel Phys. Rev. Lett. 39 1977 102 105 [24] J. Kondo Prog. Theo. Phys. 32 1964 37 49 [25] B. Shen Q. Guo Y. Gong W.S. Zhan J.G. Zhao J. Appl. Phys. 81 1997 4661 4663 [26] B.D. Cullity Introduction to Magnetic Materials 1972 Addison-Wesley Reading, Massachusetts [27] L. Berger G. Bergmann C.L. Chien C.R. Westgate The Hall Effect and Its Applications 1980 Plenum Press New York and London [28] J. Smit Physica 16 1951 612 627 [29] L. Berger Phys. Rev. B 2 1970 4559 4566 [30] H. Beck H.-J. Gűntherodt Glassy Metals III, Topics in Applied Physics vol. 72 1994 Springer Berlin [31] P.C. Chu, Hall effect and related electrical and magnetic properties in various quinary and senary high-entropy alloys selected from Al, Co, Cr, Fe, Ni, and Ti, M.S. thesis, Department of Material Science and Engineering, NTHU, Taiwan, 2009.

Abstract:Effects of Cr content on microstructures and hot hardness of AlCoCr x FeMo 0.5 Ni high-entropy alloys ( x = 0–2.0) were investigated. The cast microstructure of AlCoCr x FeMo 0.5 Ni consists of B2 and σ phases, both being multi-element solid solutions. Increasing Cr content increases the volume fraction of σ phase and causes the matrix phase of the dendrite to change from B2 phase to σ phase. The alloy hardness increases from Hv 601 at x = 0 to Hv 867 at x = 2.0 as a result of increasing amount of hard σ phase. A phase diagram for the AlCoCr x FeMo 0.5 Ni alloy system is constructed based on SEM, HTXRD and DTA analyses, providing useful information for understanding and designing high-entropy alloys. All the AlCoCr x FeMo 0.5 Ni alloys possess higher hot-hardness level than that of Ni-based superalloys, In 718 and In 718 H, from room temperature to 1273 K. Cr-1.5 and Cr-2.0 alloys exhibit a transition temperature higher than that of Co-based alloy T-800 by about 200 K and have respective hardness values, Hv 374 and Hv 450 at 1273 K, being much higher than those, around Hv 127, of In 718 and In 718 H. The mechanism of larger strengthening and softening resistance is related with B2 and σ phases, both having multi-principal-element effect. The AlCoCr x FeMo 0.5 Ni alloy system has a potential in high-temperature applications. Keywords Hardness measurement Non-ferrous alloys Casting 1 Introduction Conventionally, alloy design was based on one major metal element [1,2] . In 1995, a novel alloy design concept utilizing high mixing entropy to design high-entropy alloys (hereafter called HEAs) has been proposed [3] . By this, HEAs were defined to contain at least five major metal elements, each has a concentration between 5 at % and 35 at %. HEAs might exhibit attractive properties, such as high hardness, good thermal stability, high elevated-temperature strength, and good corrosion resistance explaining their potential applications in different aspects [4–14] . In this study, AlCoCr x FeMo 0.5 Ni alloys are derived from a previous Al–Co–Cr–Cu–Fe–Ni alloy system which has received significant studies [8,15–17] . Although this previous system exhibits a wide spectrum of microstructure and provides attractive mechanical properties, Cu segregation in the interdendrite region is the common feature which is harmful for hot working and high-temperature strength due to the incipient melting point of Cu segregation. To overcome this drawback and to increase the softening resistance at high temperatures, Mo is used to replace Cu in view of its high melting point and elastic modulus. The molar amount of Mo is designed to be one half of Al, Co, Fe, and Ni for not increasing too much cost but having its significant effect. Cr content is varied to see its effect and optimization on the microstructure and room temperature and high-temperature properties. Phase diagram with two variables of temperature and Cr content is built up to enhance the understanding and utilization of this alloy system. For assessing the strength and softening resistance of the present alloys and commercial elevated-temperature alloys, in situ hot hardness measurement was performed in this study. Similar tests were also performed for tools, molds and superalloys in literature [18,19] . In analysis of hot hardness data, an equation form proposed by Westbrook is well known for identifying the softening resistance and revealing the softening mechanism [20] : (1) H = A e − B T where H = hardness in kg mm −2 ; T = test temperature in K; and A , B = constants. The constant A is called intrinsic hardness and B is softening coefficient or thermal coefficient of hardness. By this equation, two sets of A and B constants are commonly obtained at low- and high-temperature ranges corresponding to two different deformation mechanisms. At low-temperature region the major deformation mechanism of softening is slip, while at high-temperature region the major deformation mechanisms of softening are related with diffusional phenomenon, such as (1) slip along more than one slip system due to increased atomic mobility, (2) dislocation climb, and (3) grain boundary rotation [21,22] . 2 Material and methods Table 1 shows the designated compositions of experimental AlCoCr x FeMo 0.5 Ni alloys (Cr– x alloy hereafter represent the alloy with chromium content x in molar ratio). Raw elemental material, Al, Co, Cr, Fe, and Ni with purity higher than 99 wt % and master alloy, Fe-61.5 wt % Mo, were melted to prepare the alloys by using arc-melting method under argon atmosphere. Four times of re-melting and re-solidification were performed for each sample to ensure the uniformity in composition. Microstructure and compositions were analyzed with a scanning electron microscope (SEM, JEOL-5410) attached with X-ray energy dispersive spectrometer (SEM-EDS). Crystal structures were examined with X-Ray diffractometer (XRD, Rigaku ME510-FM2) at 30 kV and 20 mA with a scanning rate of 4°/min from 30° to 90°. Room-temperature Vickers hardness measurements were performed using a hardness tester (MATSUZAWA SEIKI MV-1) with a load of 5 kg and duration time of 15 s. Five points of indentation were taken to obtain an average hardness. The melting and phase transformation temperatures were determined using a differential thermal analyzer (DTA, Pyris Diamond TG/DTA) at a heating rate of 0.33 K/s. The in situ X-ray diffraction to identify the thermal stability and phase transformation were performed with a high temperature X-ray diffractometer (HTXRD, SHIMADZU Lab X XRD-6000) equipped with a vacuum heating stage (Anton Parr HTK 1200N). The operation conditions were 30 kV and 20 mA for the X-ray tube, 4°/min for scanning speed, and 20–100° for scanning range. A vacuum level of near 1.5 × 10 −4 Torr was maintained in the chamber using a turbo pump throughout the measurements. The XRD patterns were recorded at various temperatures with 100 K interval from 573 K to 1373 K. The heating rate from one temperature to the next was 50 K/min and the holding time before diffraction is 5 min. Hot hardness measurement was conducted with a high-temperature hardness tester (Akashi AVK-CO) equipped with a heating and vacuum part (Akashi AVK-HF). A load of 5 kg and dwell time of 15 s were used. The chamber was purged with argon and then evacuated to 1.9 × 10 −4 Torr for three times and finally filled with argon to a pressure close to 1 atm before measuring. The test temperatures were from 573 K to 1273 K at an interval of 100 K. Heating rate was 10 K/min for each temperature increase. For each temperature at least three indentations were taken to get an average value of hardness. The specimens for hot hardness measurements were 1.5 mm in thickness and 10 mm in diameter. They were ground and polished by standard metallographic procedure. Final polish was done with diamond paste of 1 μm grade. 3 Results and discussion 3.1 Microstructure and constituent phases Fig. 1 shows the XRD patterns of AlCoCr x FeMo 0.5 Ni alloys in the as-cast state. Only two phases: B2 ( a = 2.87 Å) and σ phase ( a = 8.87 Å and c = 4.62 Å) are identified. This reveals the interesting phenomena that although AlCoCr x FeMo 0.5 Ni alloys have six principal elements, the number of phases is much less than the maximum number of phases allowed by Gibbs phase rule. This phenomenon has been generally found in previous high-entropy alloys. It has been attributable to the high entropy effect which interferes the complexity among multi-principal elements and enhances the mutual solubility of different elements and the stability of solid solution phases [3,6–11,15–17] . In the present alloys, one is solid-solution B2 phase and the other is solid-solution σ phase. σ Phase is similar to that of the binary intermediate phase CoCr, which is a body-centered tetragonal structure with lattice constants of a = 8.81 Å and c = 4.56 Å according to the JCPDS card. It in effect is a solution-type intermediate phase since σ phase exists in several related binary and ternary phase diagrams, i.e., Co–Cr, Fe–Cr, Ni–Mo, Fe–Mo, Fe–Cr–Mo, Cr–Mo–Ni, Co–Fe–Mo, Fe–Co–Cr, and Al–Mo–Ni [23] and show significant solubility for Co, Cr, Fe, Ni, and Mo but much less for Al. For such a multi-element σ phase, Co, Fe, and Ni occupy the same site whereas Cr and Mo occupy the other same site in the crystal structure. Therefore, the multi-element σ phase is in fact a solution phase of CoCr, FeCr, NiMo, and FeMo intermediate phases. From the practical viewpoint such a multi-element σ phase is very probable to have improved hardness and toughness since more kinds of solute atoms could increase the lattice distortion to enhance solution hardening, and also reduce the degree of long-range order to enhance toughness. In addition, multi-element σ phase could be fine in morphology due to the sluggish diffusion of atoms in the multi-element matrix [3,6] . This could further improve hardness and toughness. Fig. 2 shows the SEM backscattered electron images of the as-cast AlCoCr x FeMo 0.5 Ni alloys. The chemical compositions of different regions and phases were obtained by EDS and listed in Table 2 . Fig. 2 (a) shows the microstructure of the Cr-0 alloy, which has dendrite phase (labeled as A) and interdendrite phase with eutectic structure (labeled as B). Table 2 indicates that the dendrite phase has higher Al and Ni contents than those of the overall composition whereas the interdendrite phase has higher Mo content. Since the small gray phase in the eutectic region is the same as the dendrite phase, it is expected the white phase would contain even higher amount of Mo. Therefore, from the XRD and composition analysis of constituent phases, it leads to that the gray phase of Cr-0 alloy is a B2 phase and the white phase in the interdendrite eutectic structure is σ phase. Fig. 2 (b) and (c) shows that the Cr-0.5 and Cr-1.0 alloys contain no eutectic regions but exhibit a simple dendritic structure composing of dendrite (labeled as A) and interdendrite (labeled as B). It can be seen that both dendrite and interdendrite display modulated structure like the spinodal decomposition structure as reported for Al x CoCrCuFeNi alloys [17] . The characteristic width and spacing in the modulated structure are in the order of submicron meter. Table 2 shows that the overall composition of dendrites is rich in Al and Ni whereas that of the interdendrites is rich in Cr and Mo. This suggests that the Al- and Ni-rich dendrite with B2 structure first forms and then due to the partitioning of more Cr and Mo to liquid phase upon subsequent cooling, Cr- and Mo-rich interdendrite with B2 structure forms as the outer envelope of the cored dendrite. Because of the difference in Cr and Mo contents, the B2 dendrite precipitates out a smaller volume fraction of fine σ phase (white phases) but the B2 interdendrite precipitates out larger volume fraction of σ phase in the cooling stage after solidification. The precipitation results in modulated structures (white phase is σ and gray phase is B2) both in dendrite and interdendrite. Figs. 2 (d) and (e) shows the microstructures of Cr-1.5 and Cr-2.0 alloys. It reveals that the volume fraction of gray phase (labeled as A) is remarkably reduced whereas that of white phase increases. From the composition analysis, region A is rich in Al and Ni, whereas region B is rich in Cr and Mo. Thus referring to the phase morphology and distribution it can be depicted that for Cr-1.5 and Cr-2.0 alloy the Cr- and Mo-rich primary dendrite (B2) first form, then Al- and Ni-rich gray phase (B2) forms in the dendrite front. After solidification, Al- and Ni- rich precipitates form in the Cr- and Mo-rich primary dendrite which is turned into σ phase, while σ phase precipitates forms in the Al- and Ni-rich gray phase. Fig. 2 also shows that the relative amount of σ phase to that of B2 phase increases as the Cr content increases from x = 0 to x = 2.0, indicating that the element Cr is an σ phase stabilizer. 3.2 DTA analysis and high temperature XRD patterns of AlCoCr x FeMo 0.5 Ni alloys Fig. 3 shows the DTA curves of AlCoCr x FeMo 0.5 Ni alloys. Solidus temperatures are identified at the onsets of melting which cause specimen's shape to collapse with a certain degree. It can be seen that the melting point increases with Cr content as Cr has a melting point of 2148 K. Dissolution temperature of σ phase cannot be identified in the DTA curves. Direct annealing treatment at the temperature up to 1593 K and subsequently water quenching does not dissolve the σ phase as proven by XRD. This suggests that the dissolution temperature of σ phase is very close to the solidus temperature. Fig. 4 presents the XRD patterns of the AlCoCr x FeMo 0.5 Ni alloys in situ taken at different temperatures from room temperature to 1373 K. Phase transformation points can been identified from these patterns, which delineate the boundary line between phase regions in phase diagram as plotted in Section 3.3 . The Cr-0, Cr-0.5 and Cr-1.0 alloys have B2 and σ phase at low temperatures, however an FCC phase is newly formed at 1073 K. No new phase is found for Cr-1.5 and Cr-2.0 alloys which has B2 and σ phase at all the testing temperatures. 3.3 Phase diagram The phase diagram of the AlCoCr x FeMo 0.5 Ni alloy system with various Cr contents is constructed to a first approximation according to the results of microstructure, HTXRD and DTA analyses as shown in Fig. 5 . At the Cr content from x = 0–1.0, the equilibrium phases in the temperature from 1073 K to solidus line are FCC + B2 + σ while those below 1073 K is B2 + σ. However, it has been found that the B2 phase first form during the solidification and the FCC phase is inhibited but σ phase forms during the cooling in copper mold. At x = 1.5 and 2.0, the equilibrium phases below solidus line is B2 + σ. In the present casting process, σ and B2 phases form during solidification and remain in the subsequent cooling. Because the phase transformation temperatures have been obtained by heating curves in DTA analyses and double-checked with HTXRD, the phase diagram can be regarded close to equilibrium condition. According to the phase rule F = C − P + 1 ( F : degrees of freedom, C : number of components, and P : number of phases) [24] , the degrees of freedom for any single phase in this six-component alloy system equal to six, that for two phase equal to five and that for three phase equal to four. This suggests that concentrations of the six components in these solid solution phases could be varied within a range of composition and temperature under the degrees of freedom. 3.4 Mechanical properties of AlCoCr x FeMo 0.5 Ni alloys 3.4.1 Room-temperature hardness and crack length of indentation Fig. 6 shows the room-temperature Vickers hardness and overall crack length around diamond pyramid indentation of as-cast AlCoCr x FeMo 0.5 Ni alloys as functions of Cr content. Those of the Al x CoCrCuFeNi alloys [8] from which the present alloy were derived are compared to see the property improvement. The variation of hardness shown in Fig. 6 (a) can be related with the relative volume fractions of hard σ phase and less hard B2 phase. Evidences have shown that σ phase is the hardest phase since microhardness measurements on the dendrite (with less σ phase) and the interdendrite (with more σ phase) in the Cr-1.0 alloy give Hv 634 and Hv 824, respectively. Therefore, the alloy hardness increase with increased volume fraction of σ phase as the Cr content increases from x = 0 to x = 2.0. For the variation of crack length which is an indicator of fracture toughness [25] , it can be found from Fig. 6 (a) that the crack length increases and thus toughness decreases as hardness increases. This follows the general trend in materials. From the comparison of the hardness and crack length levels between the present alloys and the Al x CoCrCuFeNi alloys [8] , it can be seen that the present alloys are superior in the aspects of hardness and fracture toughness. For example, with the same value of hardness (Hv 600), the Cr-0 alloy has no cracks around the indentation, but the Al 2.3 CoCrCuFeNi alloy having a crack length about 100 μm. Furthermore, Cr-1.0, Cr-1.5 and Cr-2.0 alloys have higher hardness (above Hv 700) than the hardest one of the Al x CoCrCuFeNi alloys (i.e., x = 2.8), but their crack lengths are smaller. The hardness superiority is attributable to the high volume fraction of σ phase in the present alloys since σ phase is much harder than BCC phase which is the main strengthening phase in the Al x CoCrCuFeNi alloys. As for the strength–toughness superiority, it is not clear about the exact mechanism, but it indeed suggests that the present fine modulated structure of B2 and σ phases is better than the modulated structure of B2 and BCC phases in the Al x CoCrCuFeNi alloys. 3.4.2 Hot hardness Fig. 7 shows the variations of hot hardness ( H ) with temperature ( T ) for the AlCoCr x FeMo 0.5 Ni alloys, Ni-based superalloys of In 718 (as-received) and In 718 H (precipitation hardened), and Co-based superalloy of Tribaloy T-800 (data are obtained from Stellite Company website). The compositions of In 718 and T-800 are noted in Table 3 . It can be seen that the curves of Cr-0 and Cr-0.5 alloys are lower than that of T-800 below 900 K but higher above 900 K since the hardness value of T-800 decreases at a faster rate. In addition, Cr-1.5 and Cr-2.0 alloys are much higher in hardness than that of T-800, In 718 and In 718 H, and have a transition temperature higher than that of T-800 by around 200 K and close to that of In 718 and In 718 H. Cr-2.0 alloy exhibits the highest hot hardness of about Hv 450 at 1273 K, which is around 3.5 folds of the hardness values, ∼Hv 127, of In 718 and In 718 H. It is noted that In 718 is the only one to show the abnormal heating behavior (i.e., hardness increase with temperature increase) in the temperature range from 873 K to 1073 K, which is mainly attributable to the precipitation hardening effect as evidenced by the precipitation hardening used to strengthen In 718 H. In 718 becomes soften at a faster rate and has similar hardness to In 718 H at above 1073 K. The data in Fig. 7 are re-plotted as Fig. 8 by using ln(H) vs. T . The variation trends can be represented by two straight lines which intersect in the temperature range 970–1100 K, suggesting two different deformation mechanisms [20] as mentioned in the Introduction section. The values of transition temperature ( T T ), intrinsic hardness ( A ), and softening coefficient ( B ) calculated according to Westbrook [20] are summarized in Table 3 . It shows that Cr-0 and Cr-0.5 alloys have almost the same intrinsic hardness, softening coefficient, and transition temperature. As Cr content increases, A I becomes more positive (due to higher intrinsic harness) and B I becomes more negative (due to a larger softening), whereas A II and B II have no trends. But it is noted that the Cr-1.0 and Cr-2.0 alloys have the least negative B II values (due to the least softening). These least negative values of B II are about half that of In 718, suggesting that Cr-1.0 and Cr-2.0 alloys could sustain its strength up to 1273 K very effectively. Furthermore, all the present alloys have less negative value of B II as compared to those of In 718, In 718 H and T-800, revealing their potential in high-temperature applications. It is interesting to see that the softening coefficients, B II , of pure metals such as Mo, Ni, Cr, Si and Fe [26] are more negative by two order magnitudes than those of AlCoCr x FeMo 0.5 Ni alloys, In 718, and T-800, indicating that alloying indeed has tremendous effect on the softening behavior at elevated temperatures. As AlCoCr x FeMo 0.5 Ni contains a substantial volume fraction of σ phase, which increases with increasing the Cr content, it suggests the σ phase is the main strengthener not only at room temperature but also at high temperatures. This is an important finding. Multi-element solution hardening is believed to have important contributions to the strength and the resistance to softening. For the region below transition temperature where the deformation mechanism is slip, multi-element solid-solution phases such as B2 and σ phase would have a larger resistance to slip deformation because of solution hardening mechanism. This is reasonable since, even at high temperatures, the matrix is still effectively strengthened by highly concentrated solute atoms according to the mechanism of solution hardening. Furthermore, for the region above transition temperature where the major deformation mechanism is diffusional phenomenon, multi-element solid-solution phases with highly concentrated solute atoms also have the benefit to resist creep deformation as the vacancies in the matrix is limited in concentration and interact with all atoms to reduce the strain and thus strain energy around each vacancies. This interaction would render vacancies more difficult to migrate from one site to next site to assist the creep deformation as compared with the case with a host matrix. 4 Conclusions 1. The cast microstructure of AlCoCr x FeMo 0.5 Ni consists of B2 and σ phases, both being multi-element solid solutions. Increasing Cr content increases the volume fraction of σ phase and causes the matrix phase of the dendrite to change from B2 phase to σ phase. 2. Schematic phase diagram of AlCoCr x FeMo 0.5 Ni is constructed according to microstructure, HTXRD, and DTA analyses providing valuable information for alloy design and prediction. 3. Cr-2.0 alloy is the hardest one due to its highest volume fraction of hard σ phase. 4. AlCoCr x FeMo 0.5 Ni alloys exhibit a combination of hardness and toughness superior to that of the alloy system Al x CoCrCuFeNi from which it derives. 5. All AlCoCr x FeMo 0.5 Ni alloys possess higher hardness values than that of Ni-based superalloys, In 718 and In 718 H, at temperatures from room temperature to 1273 K. 6. Cr-1.5 and Cr-2.0 alloys have a transition temperature higher than that of T-800 by around 200 K but close to that of In 718 and In 718 H. 7. Cr-1.5 and Cr-2.0 alloys exhibit hot hardness values of around Hv 374 and Hv 450 at 1273 K, respectively, being much higher than Hv 127 of In 718 and In 718 H. Furthermore, the Cr-2.0 alloy displays the lowest softening coefficient that is only half that of In 718. 8. The present AlCoCr x FeMo 0.5 Ni alloys show good softening resistance in both temperature regimes for dislocation-slip deformation and creep deformation, respectively. Besides the main strengthening from hard σ phase and less hard B2 phase, significant solution hardening and lower vacancy mobility due to multi-principal-element composition have contributions to softening resistance. Acknowledgements The authors are pleased to acknowledge the financial support for this research by Ministry of Economic Affairs R.O.C. under grant no. 97-EC-17-A-08-S1-03 . References [1] H. Committee ASM Handbook, Properties and Selection: Irons Steels, and High Performance Alloys 10 ed. 1990 ASM International [2] H. Committee ASM Handbook, Properties and Selection: Nonferrous Alloys and Special-Purpose Materials 10 ed. 1990 ASM International [3] J.W. Yeh S.K. Chen S.J. Lin J.Y. Gan T.S. Chin T.T. Shun C.H. Tsau S.Y. Chang Adv. Eng. Mater. 6 2004 299 303 [4] C.H. Lai K.H. Cheng S.J. Lin J.W. Yeh Surf. Coat. Technol. 202 2008 3732 3738 [5] S.Y. Chang D.S. Chen Appl. Phys. Lett. 94 2009 3 [6] J.W. Yeh Ann. Chim.-Sci. Mater. 31 2006 633 648 [7] P.K. Huang J.W. Yeh T.T. Shun S.K. Chen Adv. Eng. Mater. 6 2004 74 78 [8] C.J. Tong M.R. Chen S.K. Chen J.W. Yeh T.T. Shun S.J. Lin S.Y. Chang Metall. Mater. Trans. A 36A 2005 1263 1271 [9] Y.Y. Chen U.T. Hong H.C. Shih J.W. Yeh T. Duval Corros. Sci. 47 2005 2679 2699 [10] Y.J. Zhou Y. Zhang Y.L. Wang G.L. Chen Appl. Phys. Lett. 90 2007 3 [11] Y.J. Zhou Y. Zhang F.J. Wang Y.L. Wang G.L. Chen J. Alloy. Compd. 466 2008 201 204 [12] T.T. Shun Y.C. Du J. Alloy. Compd. 479 2009 157 160 [13] M.H. Tsai C.W. Wang C.H. Lai J.W. Yeh J.Y. Gan Appl. Phys. Lett. 92 2008 3 [14] X.F. Wang Y. Zhang Y. Qiao G.L. Chen Intermetallics 15 2007 357 362 [15] C.Y. Hsu J.W. Yeh S.K. Chen T.T. Shun Metall. Mater. Trans. A 35A 2004 1465 1469 [16] C.C. Tung J.W. Yeh T.T. Shun S.K. Chen Y.S. Huang H.C. Chen Mater. Lett. 61 2007 1 5 [17] C.J. Tong Y.L. Chen S.K. Chen J.W. Yeh T.T. Shun C.H. Tsau S.J. Lin S.Y. Chang Metall. Mater. Trans. A 36A 2005 881 893 [18] J. Sato T. Omori K. Oikawa I. Ohnuma R. Kainuma K. Ishida Science 312 2006 90 91 [19] R.S. Sundar T.R.G. Kutty D.H. Sastry Intermetallics 8 2000 427 437 [20] G.E. Dieter Mechanical Metallurgy 1988 SI Metric McGraw-Hill [21] V.P.K.V.A. Borisenko Acta Metall. 25 1977 251 256 [22] K.B. Khana T.R.G. Kutty M.K. Surappa Mater. Sci. Eng. A 427 2006 76 82 [23] H. Committee ASM Handbook, Alloy Phase Diagrams 10 ed. 1992 ASM International [24] R.A. Swalin Thermodynamics of Solids 2nd ed. 1972 John Wiley & Sons Inc. [25] W.D. Schubert H. Neumeister G. Kinger B. Lux Int. J. Refract. Met. Hard Mater. 16 1998 133 142 [26] A. Okada Y. Yamamoto R. Yoda Tetsu To Hagane: J. Iron Steel Inst. Jpn. 73 1987 1186 1192

Electrical, magnetic, and Hall properties of AlxCoCrFeNi high-entropy alloys

On the superior hot hardness and softening resistance of AlCoCrxFeMo0.5Ni high-entropy alloys

Microstructural Evolution and Mechanical Properties of Al0.3CoCrFeNiSix. High-Entropy Alloys Containing Coherent Nanometer-Scaled Precipitates

Effect of Aluminum Addition on the Microstructure, Magnetic, and Mechanical Properties of FeCrCoNiMn High-Entropy Alloy

Preparation and properties of FeNiMnCuC0.2Alx high-entropy alloy

Microstructure, Thermophysical and Electrical Properties in AlxCoCrFeNi (0 ≤ X ≤2) High-Entropy Alloys

First-principles calculation of phase transitions and mechanical properties of (CoCrNi)100−xAlx (0 ≤ x ≤ 28 at. %) high-entropy alloys

Composition and phase structure dependence of magnetic properties for Co2FeCr0.5Alx (x=0.9, 1.2) multi principal component alloys

Microstructure, Mechanical Properties, and Damping Capacity of AlxCoCrFeNi High-Entropy Alloys Prepared by Spark Plasma Sintering

The Microstructures and Properties Changes Induced by Al:Co Ratios of the Al CrCo FeNi High Entropy Alloys

Mechanical properties and water vapour corrosion behaviour of Al x CoCrFeNi high-entropy alloys

The AC Soft Magnetic Properties of FeCoNi x CuAl (1.0 ≤ x ≤ 1.75) High-Entropy Alloys

Novel Fe2CoNi(AlSi)x High-Entropy Alloys with Attractive Soft Magnetic and Mechanical Properties

The AC Soft Magnetic Properties of FeCoNixCuAl (1.0 ≤ x ≤ 1.75) High-Entropy Alloys.

Microstructures and properties of Fe1.25CoNi1.25CrxAl0.25 high-entropy alloys after cold-rolling and annealing

Effects of Al and Co contents on the microstructure and properties of AlxCoCryFeNi high-entropy alloys

Effects of Cr/Fe Ratio on Structural Evolution and Tensile Properties of the Fe75.7−xCrxNi15.1Al4.6Ti4.6 High‐Entropy Alloys

Microstructure and mechanical properties of Al0.4Co0.5V0.6FeNi high-entropy alloys processed by homogenization treatment

Microstructure and Mechanical Property of As-Cast, -Homogenized, and -Deformed AlxCoCrFeNi (0≤x≤2) High-Entropy Alloys

Microstructure Evolution and Compressive Property Variation of CoCrFeNiAlx High Entropy Alloys Produced by Directional Solidification

Effect of Al/Ni ratio on phase, microstructure and mechanical properties of the Al CrFeMnNi2- high entropy alloys