COMPARISON OF DISINFECTION EFFICACY OF FOUR AUTOMATIC ENDOSCOPE DISINFECTORS

钟昱文,翁涛华,黄美卿,张里君,柯昌文

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1001-7658.2008.04.006

2008-01-01

Abstract:Objective To compare the disinfection efficacy of four automatic endoscope disinfectors. Methods Laboratory test and simulated field trial were used to compare the efficacy of four automatic endoscope disinfectors. Results When automatic ultrasonic atomization endoscope disinfector combined with aerosol fumigation with 20.7 g/L glutaraldehyde for 3 min was used, 93.21% of spores of Bacillus subtilis var. niger on interior surface of PTFE tube were eliminated, while the elimination rates of the spores in endoscope biopsy channel and the external surface of endoscope were 16.7% and 73.3% respectively. When SY-600 automatic endoscope disinfector was used, 99.94% of spores of Bacillus subtilis var. niger in interior surface of PTFE tube could be eliminated after irrigating with 20.1g/L glutaraldehyde for 10 min, while the elimination rates of the spores in endoscope biopsy channel and on the surface of endoscope were 86.7% and 100% respectively. When HY-0610 automatic endoscope disinfector combined with irrigation with 507mg/L peracetic acid for 5 min, and WAYWIN-2000 automatic endoscope disinfector combined with irrigation with 1179mg/L peracetic acid for 10 min were used, the elimination rates of spores of Bacillus subtilis var. niger in interior surface of PTFE tube, in endoscope biopsy channel and on the endoscope external surface were all 100%. Conclusions The disinfection efficacy of automatic endoscope disinfector combined with irrigation with glutaraldehyde is better than that of ultrasonic atomization with glutaraldehyde, but all their efficacy can not fulfill the requirement of eligible disinfection. However, the automatic endoscope disinfectors using irrigation with peracetic acid can fulfill the requirement of disinfection of the tubes and the external surface of endoscope.