Evaluation of MRA in Aortic Dissection Diagnosis-Comparison of MRA Findings with the Operative Discovery in 136 Patients

张宏家,孙衍庆,范占祥,刘愚勇,李景伟

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.issn.1001-4497.2006.03.004

2006-01-01

Abstract:Objective To evaluate MRA in diagnosis of aortic dissection. Methods From October 2000 to December 2002, 136 patients (Male/Female, 116/20) suspected of aortic disease were examined with true FISP 3D CE MRA before operation, and the results were compared with the pathological change during operation. The average age was (45.5±12.2) years (12～70 years). They were divided in two groups: Aortic dissection group (group I), 108 patients including DeBakey type I 41 cases, DeBakey type II 9 cases, DeBakey type III 57 cases, and 76 patients emergency within 2 weeks after the initial onset of symptoms. Non aortic dissection group (group II) ,28 patients including Marfan's aneurysm 6 cases, ascending aortic aneurysm 9 cases, ascending aortic pseudo aneurysm 1 case, arch aneurysm 1 case, descending aortic aneurysm 4 cases, descending aortic pseudo aneurysm 5 cases, aneurysm caused by aortic coarctation 1 case, arch pseudo aneurysm 1 case. Results The diagnosis of MRA was the same with the discovery in the operation. Both the sensitivity and the specificity of the presence and the differentiation of aortic dissection were 100%. The sensitivity was as followed: the localization of intimal tears was 85.2%; the involvement of arch branches was 90.3%; the blood extravasation was 100%; the blood flow of the false lumen was 98.1%; but the specificity of all was 100%. Conclusion True FISP 3D CE MRA is safe and reliable method to diagnose aortic dissection. It seems capable to replace the aortic angiography. It is considered as the golden criteria for aortic dissection and other aortic diseases.