Question about the Statement That Polo in Central Plains Originates from Persia

Huang Cong
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1001-9154.2009.02.001
2009-01-01
Abstract:In this article,literature review and logical reasoning are employed to analyze several documents about Persian Polo.Research findings show: it cannot be proved that "Boluolin" recorded in Jingxing Records has something to do with Polo;Polo described in Kings reflects a kind of national spirit in FeiErDuoXi era rather than historical fact in Wusi period in Bosika era;Quqiu described in the latter half of Xirongzhuan in the Combination of the New and the Old Tang Books cannot equal Polo;Pompilius,a Persian king recorded in Xirongzhuan of the Old Tang Book and Xiyuchuan of the New Tang Book is a historical figure in the seventh or eighth century,while there are records about Polo in Central Plains in the fifth or sixth century,so Polo in Central Plains cannot be derived from Persia.Besides phonological studies and historical statistics prove that "Boluo" isn't the then Polo.It is concluded that the several documents cannot prove true the statement that Polo in Central Plains originates from Persia.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?