Detection Rate of Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia with Histological Prostatitis: Comparison Between Two Different Diagnostic Standards

Xiang-hua ZHANG,Qian ZHANG,Xue-song LI,zheng ZHANG,Xin-yu YANG,Qun HE
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1674-0785.2007.07.010
2007-01-01
Abstract:Objective The detection rate of benign prostatic hyperplasia(BPH) with histological prostatitis was reported to be greatly different between domestic and international studies.Our hypothesis is if this difference may be due to different diagnostic standards regarding histological prostatitis.The purpose of this study is to evaluate possible effect of two different diagnostic standards on the detection rate of BPH with histological prostatitis.Methods The situation of histological prostatitis in a total of 530 specimens of BPH following operation was analyzed according to the diagnostic standards of Peking University Institute of Urology and the international histopathological classification system,respectively.Results According to the diagnostic standards of Peking University Institute of Urology,histological prostatitis was detected in 208 BPH cases(39.2%),while 472 BPH cases(89.1%) were diagnosed as histological prostatitis with the international histopathological classification system(P0.01).Based on the international histopathological classification system,mild histological prostatitis was detected in 91 cases(19.3%),moderate prostatitis was 106 cases(22.4%) and severe prostatitis was 275 cases(58.3%).A significant difference was also noted between the detection rate of severe histological prostatitis by the international histopathological classification system and histological prostatitis by the diagnostic standards of Peking University Institute of Urology(P0.05).Conclusions The present study indicated that the major differences in the detection rate of BPH with histological prostatitis between domestic and international studies could be due to different diagnostic standards regarding histological prostatitis.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?