Comparison of the clinicopathologic features of prostate cancer in US and Chinese populations

Lei Zhang,Xiaoyan Liu,Rong Xia,Fei Chen,Xin Wang,Jia Bao,Yongzhao Shao,Xian Lu,Yan Wang,Jili Wang,May Thu Tun,Jonathan Melamed,Hebert Lepor,Fang-Ming Deng,Dongwen Wang,Guoping Ren
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prp.2022.153933
2022-01-01
Abstract:Background: Prostate cancer (PCa) is the most common malignant tumor found among men in the United States. Incidence rates of PCa have recently grown in Asian countries, partially due to the comprehensive implementation of early detection systems. Interestingly, a prospective cohort study showed that adopting a westernized dietary pattern was associated with a higher risk of being diagnosed with PCa among Korean and Japanese men. However, a comparison of current clinicopathological features of PCa between American and Chinese men is lacking. In this study, we report the current clinicopathological features of PCa in Chinese men and compare them to those of patients in the USA.Materials and methods: Case cohorts included, in total, 871 PCa cases with prostatectomy sequentially treated since 2017, including 299 cases from USA and 572 cases from two different academic hospitals in China. The parameters, including patient's age, preoperative Prostate-Specific Antigen (PSA) level, Gleason score, Grade Group, stage and tumor focality, were collected, analyzed and compared using two sample t-test, Wilcoxon rank sum test, Pearson's Chi-squared test and Fisher's exact test.Results: Significant differences were demonstrated in the mean age of patients, preoperative PSA levels, extraprostatic extension, Gleason scores, and Grade Groups (p < 0.05). PCa patients in the Chinese group were older than patients in the USA group (67.81 vs. 63.53, p < 0.01). The preoperative PSA levels in the Chinese group were higher than those in the USA group (11.69 v.s 6.30, p < 0.01). A higher percentage of high Grade Groups (Groups 4 and 5) was observed in the Chinese group (25.7%) compared to the USA cohort (17.11%), while Grade Group 2 was more common in the USA group than in the Chinese group (51.68% vs. 32.52%, p < 0.01).Conclusions: All these data suggest that the clinicopathologic features of PCa are different between the USA and Chinese populations, which may be influenced by treatment strategies (including surgical case selection criteria).
What problem does this paper attempt to address?