Study on the Implementation Evaluation of Urban Construction Boundary in Land Use Planning-A Case Study of Hangzhou
FENG Ke,WU Ci-fang,HAN Hao-ying,WU Yu-zhe
2010-01-01
JOURNAL OF NATURAL RESOURCES
Abstract:Urban sprawl is a world phenomenon. In China, with rapid development of urbanization, the characteristics of urban sprawl are increasingly conspicuous, such as low density, higher land consumption, scattered development, leapfrog development, strip development and so on. To solve these problems and utilize land resource rationally, there is a tradition of managing urban growth through land use regulation tools, especially land use planning. It is quite similar to the policy named "growth management"adopted by western countries, both of which are system arrangement to control urban sprawl through location, scale and time. At present, policy evaluation on land use planning in our country only focused on the comparison between planned indices from beginning to end, lacking sense of space. Combining with literature review, the method of "boundary evaluation" was introduced. Based on the remote sensing (RS) and geographic information system (GIS) analysis of the Landsat 5 thematic mapper (TM) satellite images of 1996 and 2005, this research examined the control effectiveness of UCB (Urban Construction Boundary). Three indicators on boundary control were proposed, including the effectiveness of boundary containment, land inventory sufficiency and illegal adjacent development to the UCB. The results showed that: 1) the UCB was so limited in guiding urban growth that most newly developed occurred outside. Moreover, the scale of newly developed land outside UCB is 33.9 km~2 and that inside UCB is 29.1 km~2;2) much new growth occurred near the boundary. In details, a total of 66.3 km long UCB emerged at the edge-type land development, accounting for a total length (239.3 km) of 28%;and 3) the area encompassed by the UCB might not be designed large enough to accommodate new development. The frustration of the urban growth control through the UCB mainly resulted from the lack of a transparent system for urban land use planning and control to provide sufficient information, the limitation of the traditional land use prediction method to consider contingencies, and the absence of a mechanism to monitor and adjust the UCB to respond just in time to urban change. In the future, there is still much room for improvement.