Abstract:The validity of using Gaussian assumptions for model residuals in uncertainty quantification of a groundwater reactive transport model was evaluated in this study. Least squares regression methods explicitly assume Gaussian residuals, and the assumption leads to Gaussian likelihood functions, model parameters, and model predictions. While the Bayesian methods do not explicitly require the Gaussian assumption, Gaussian residuals are widely used. This paper shows that the residuals of the reactive transport model are non-Gaussian, heteroscedastic, and correlated in time; characterizing them requires using a generalized likelihood function such as the formal generalized likelihood function developed by Schoups and Vrugt (2010). For the surface complexation model considered in this study for simulating uranium reactive transport in groundwater, parametric uncertainty is quantified using the least squares regression methods and Bayesian methods with both Gaussian and formal generalized likelihood functions. While the least squares methods and Bayesian methods with Gaussian likelihood function produce similar Gaussian parameter distributions, the parameter distributions of Bayesian uncertainty quantification using the formal generalized likelihood function are non-Gaussian. In addition, predictive performance of formal generalized likelihood function is superior to that of least squares regression and Bayesian methods with Gaussian likelihood function. The Bayesian uncertainty quantification is conducted using the differential evolution adaptive metropolis (DREAM((ZS))) algorithm; as a Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) method, it is a robust tool for quantifying uncertainty in groundwater reactive transport models. For the surface complexation model, the regression-based local sensitivity analysis and Morris-and DREAM((ZS))-based global sensitivity analysis yield almost identical ranking of parameter importance. The uncertainty analysis may help select appropriate likelihood functions, improve model calibration, and reduce predictive uncertainty in other groundwater reactive transport and environmental modeling.

Uncertainty analysis for groundwater modeling

Uncertainty Analysis in Statistical Modeling of Extreme Hydrological Events

Uncertainty analysis of groundwater flow conceptual model

Uncertainty in High and Low Flows Due to Model Structure and Parameter Errors

Review of the Uncertainty Analysis of Groundwater Numerical Simulation

Bayesian analysis for uncertainty and risk in a groundwater numerical model's predictions

Bayesian Analysis of Uncertainties in Groundwater Numerical Simulation

Reliability Analysis of the Groundwater Conceptual Model

[Uncertainty Analysis of Water Environmental Capacity in the Nonpoint Source Polluted River].

Uncertainty Assessment of Groundwater Prediction

Analysis on influence of aquifer heterogeneous simplification to groundwater numerical modeling

Assessment of Parametric Uncertainty for Groundwater Reactive Transport Modeling

Uncertainty evaluation of groundwater modeling based on multimodel method

Uncertainty of heterogeneous hydrogeological models in groundwater flow and land subsidence simulations – A case study in Huwei Town, Taiwan

Uncertainty Analysis of Groundwater Models Based on the Latin Hypercube Sampling Technique

Uncertainty assessment in watershed-scale water quality modeling and management: 1. Framework and application of generalized likelihood uncertainty estimation (GLUE) approach

Evaluating Two Sparse Grid Surrogates and Two Adaptation Criteria for Groundwater Bayesian Uncertainty Quantification

Analysis of Uncertainties Affecting Numerical Transport Models for a Potential Radioactive Waste Disposal Site

The Characteristics of Probability Distribution of Groundwater Model Output Based on Sensitivity Analysis

Evaluation of geological model uncertainty caused by data sufficiency using groundwater flow and land subsidence modeling as example

Assessing Bayesian Model Averaging Uncertainty of Groundwater Modeling Based on Information Entropy Method