Abstract:Hydrological models play an important role in water resource management, but they always suffer from various sources of uncertainties. Therefore, it is necessary to implement uncertainty analysis to gain more confidence in numerical modeling. The study employed three methods (i.e., Parameter Solution (ParaSol), Sequential Uncertainty Fitting (SUFI2), and Generalized Likelihood Uncertainty Estimation (GLUE)) to quantify the parameter sensitivity and uncertainty of the SWAT (Soil and Water Assessment Tool) model in a mountain-loess transitional watershedJingchuan River Basin (JCRB) on the Loess Plateau, China. The model was calibrated and validated using monthly observed streamflow at the Jingchuan gaging station and the modeling results showed that SWAT performed well in the study period in the JCRB. The parameter sensitivity results demonstrated that any of the three methods were capable for the parameter sensitivity analysis in this area. Among the parameters, CN2, SOL_K, and ALPHA_BF were more sensitive to the simulation of peak flow, average flow, and low flow, respectively, compared to others (e.g., ESCO, CH_K2, and SOL_AWC) in this basin. Although the ParaSol method was more efficient in capturing the most optimal parameter set, it showed limited ability in uncertainty analysis due to the narrower 95CI and poor P-factor and R-factor in this area. In contrast, the 95CIs in SUFI2 and GLUE were wider than ParaSol, indicating that these two methods can be promising in analyzing the model parameter uncertainty. However, for the model prediction uncertainty within the same parameter range, SUFI2 was proven to be slightly more superior to GLUE. Overall, through the comparisons of the proposed evaluation criteria for uncertainty analysis (e.g., P-factor, R-factor, NSE, and R-2) and the computational efficiencies, SUFI2 can be a potentially efficient tool for the parameter optimization and uncertainty analysis. This study provides an insight into selecting uncertainty analysis method in the modeling field, especially for the hydrological modeling community.

Analysis on influence of aquifer heterogeneous simplification to groundwater numerical modeling

Bayesian analysis for uncertainty and risk in a groundwater numerical model's predictions

Bayesian Analysis of Uncertainties in Groundwater Numerical Simulation

Uncertainty analysis of groundwater flow conceptual model

The Parameters Optimization in Hydrogeological Model Based on MCMC Method

Uncertainty analysis for groundwater modeling

Reliability Analysis of the Groundwater Conceptual Model

Comprehensive two-dimensional analytical modeling of groundwater levels in bi-directional sloping heterogeneous aquifers under variable recharge conditions

Uncertainty of heterogeneous hydrogeological models in groundwater flow and land subsidence simulations – A case study in Huwei Town, Taiwan

Review of the Uncertainty Analysis of Groundwater Numerical Simulation

Uncertainty Analysis of Groundwater Models Based on the Latin Hypercube Sampling Technique

Parameter Uncertainty Analysis Of The Swat Model In A Mountain-Loess Transitional Watershed On The Chinese Loess Plateau

Uncertainty evaluation of groundwater modeling based on multimodel method

Evaluating Two Sparse Grid Surrogates and Two Adaptation Criteria for Groundwater Bayesian Uncertainty Quantification

Analytical modeling of 2D groundwater flow in a semi-infinite heterogeneous domain with variable lateral sources

Application of nested sampling algorithm for assessing the uncertainty in groundwater flow model

An Improved Numerical Model for Groundwater Flow Simulation with MPFA Method on Arbitrary Polygon Grids

Identification of hydrogeological parameters based on the Bayesian method

Pollution risk evaluation of groundwater wells based on stochastic and deterministic simulation of aquifer lithology

Stochastic-based approach to quantify the uncertainty of groundwater vulnerability

Uncertainty Assessment of Groundwater Prediction