Abstract:While China has seen rapid economic growth over the last three decades, many studies document a negative correlation between traditional measurements of banking development and economic growth in China. Among many efforts to explain the low efficiency of Chinese banking sector, two arguments focus on the dominance of the four big state-owned banks but they emphasize different facets of the “Big Four.” The ownership-structure view argues that the state ownership of the largest banks and corresponding government interventions in capital allocation should be responsible for the bad performance of the banking sector. The size-structure view states that it is the improper size structure of the banking sector that leads to its low efficiency. This paper aims to empirically disentangle these two different explanations. With data on the banking sector and 28 manufacturing sectors in 30 provinces of mainland China over the period 1999-2007, this paper investigates the differential effects of banking structure on the growth rates of different industries. In order to identify the channel through which banking structure affects industrial growth, the paper constructs two interaction variables: interaction between labor intensity of each industry and banking structure at each province, interaction between the share of non-state-owned firms and banking structure. To capture the purely technological feature of each industry, the paper uses the labor-capital ratio of each U.S. manufacturing sector as a proxy for labor intensity of the corresponding Chinese manufacturing industry. We find that more labor-intensive industries grow faster than more capital-intensive industries in provinces with more active small banks, compared to provinces with more dominant Big Four branches. These results are robust to alternative measures of labor intensity. But the interaction variable used to capture the ownership-structure view is not significant in all the regressions. Thus the results are consistent with the size-structure view while not support the ownership-structure argument.

Bank Fund Reallocation and Economic Growth: Evidence from China

To What Extent Did the Economic Stimulus Package Influence Bank Lending and Corporate Investment Decisions? Evidence from China

Bank Efficiency and Regional Economic Growth: Evidence from China

An Empirical Study of the Effects of Capital Formation and Flow on the Economy of the Eastern Region of China

The Competition between Bank Branches and between State-owned Banks and their Influence on Economic Growth

An Empirical Analysis of Influential Factors of China's Capital Allocation Efficiency

Banking Structure and Economic Growth: Evidence from China

Banking Structure and Economic Growth:Evidence from Chinese Provincial Panel Data

Banking Structure and Industrial Growth: Evidence from China

FINANCIAL DEVELOPMENT, INVESTMENT EXPANSION MODE AND THE CAPITAL RETURN OF CHINA

Real estate investments and financial stability: evidence from regional commercial banks in China

Why China's Credit Increasing Contributes Little to Ecnomic Growth

Financial development and population growth: Evidence from Bank concentration in China 1

Financial development and population growth: Evidence from bank concentration in China

The Promoting Effect of Financial Development on Economic Growth: Evidence from China

Financial Development, Real Estate Investment and Economic Growth

Stock market development and economic growth: Empirical evidence from China

Bank liability structure and corporate employment: Evidence from a quasi-natural experiment in China

Reform, Interaction of Policies, and Economic Growth: Evidence from China’s Provincial Panel Data

Does Regional Financial Resource Contribute to Economic Growth? From the Perspective of Spatial Correlation Network

Bank competition and corporate employment: Evidence from the geographic distribution of bank branches in China