Perspective Effect of Mental Rotation in Different Planes
You Xuqun,Wang Peng,Yan Bihua
2007-01-01
Acta Psychologica Sinica
Abstract:Introduction The human visual system can represent an object's spatial structure using either a first-person perspective or a third-person perspective. It can also utilize either a first-person or a third-person processing mode to perform mental rotation. Since Shepard and colleagues' classical study, experiments over the next 30 years did much to elucidate the basic nature of mental rotation. However, most of the studies only concern about first-person rotation. Third-person rotation has been neglected in the field of mental exploration. Thus, the present study aimed to compare the relative difficulty of first- and third-person rotation of an imagined environment. The hypothesis was that third-person rotation would be easier than first-person rotation in the transverse and coronal planes. Method Two experiments were conducted, each comparing first- and third-person rotation in the transverse plane (Experiment 1) and coronal plane (Experiment 2), respectively. Seventy six right-handed undergraduates (aged between 19 and 21) took part in the experiments. Both of the experiments used a 2 (perspective: first- vs. third-person rotation) x 4 (angle) mixed design. Each participant performed either first- or third-person rotation. In the first-person task, participants were asked to imagine themselves rotating in the center of a four-object array to a certain angle and were then asked to guess the position of the object relative to their imagined orientation (Experiment 1: right, left, front, or back; Experiment 2: top, bottom, right, left). In the third-person task, participants were asked to imagine another person rotating in the center of a four-object array ahead of them to a certain angle and were then asked to guess the position of the object relative to that imagined person's orientation after rotation (Experiment 1: right, left, front, or back; Experiment 2: top, bottom, right, left). Reaction time (measured from the end of the question to the onset of the participants' response) and number of errors were recorded and analyzed. Results and Conclusion The results confirmed our hypothesis. In experiment 1, the third-person task was performed with shorter reaction time and fewer errors than the first-person task in the transverse plane. ANOVA revealed the main effect of perspective and angle, as well as a significant perspective-by-angle interaction. That is, RTs for the first- and third-person rotation were not different at 0 , but the overall latency of the response in the first-person rotation was greater than that in the third-person rotation at 90 , 180 , and 270 . The results of Experiment 2 were similar to that of Experiment 1. When compared to the first-person rotation, there were reduced RTs and errors for the third-person rotation in the coronal plane in which one cannot naturally locomote. The present study reveals that there is an advantage of third-person rotation over first-person rotation. Third-person rotation is easier than first-person rotation in both the transverse and coronal planes.