Abstract:Judgments of the orientations of 2D lines show systematic biases that can be described as exaggerating deviations from horizontal. These biases are not due to numeric estimation biases. An orientation of about 37° from horizontal is judged to be equidistant from horizontal and vertical. The same orientation is judged to be 45° from horizontal and 45° from vertical. One hypothesis concerning this distortion is an experience-based anisotropy in the distribution of orientation sensitive cells in visual cortex. An alternative view is that these biases are intrinsic to the encoding of spatial orientation. To tease apart these two possibilities we oriented observers at 45° from vertical and asked them to do two kinds of tasks. One task was a psychometric measurement of perceived vertical or horizontal using a forced choice method. Judgments of visual stimuli, presented in a circular aperture that removed any external visual references, were made either with respect to an egocentric (bodily) or exocentric (gravitational) reference frame. Over 150 participants were tested. Both within and between subjects, variability was much less for judgments made with respect to the exocentric (perceived gravitational) reference frame. Similarly, when required to make numeric estimates of orientation with respect to the two types of reference frame, estimates with respect to perceived gravitational frames exhibited the standard bias exaggerating deviations from horizontal. Estimates with respect to bodily frames did not. These findings are consistent with the precedence of gravitational reference frames in visual experience and imply that 2D orientation asymmetries between horizontal and vertical are not caused simply by biases in the distribution of early cortical orientation analyzers. Precision was greatest when observers were upright so that gravitational and bodily vertical were aligned, but for tilted observers, judgments made with respect to gravitational reference frames were most similar to judgments made upright. Meeting abstract presented at VSS 2012

Effects of Surrounding Frame on Visual Search for Vertical or Tilted Bars.

Both Cognitive Factors and Local Inhibition Mediate the Effect of a Surrounding Frame in Visual Search for Oriented Bars

Investigating Salience Mechanisms by Using the Effects of Surrounding Frame on the Tilted-Vertical Asymmetry in Visual Search

The Role of Cognitive Factors in the Rod-and-Frame Effect

The Rod-and-Frame Effect: The Whole is Less than the Sum of its Parts

Exocentric Reference Frames Determine 2D Orientation Bias

Respective Contribution of Orientation Contrast and Illusion of Self-Tilt to the Rod-And-Frame Effect

Orientation is Different: Interaction Between Contour Integration and Feature Contrasts in Visual Search.

Top-down interference in visual search

Deconstructing the frame effect

Modulation of contrast detection threshold by the configuration and contrast of the context

Change Detection is Easier at Texture Border Bars when They Are Parallel to the Border: Evidence for V1 Mechanisms of Bottom-Up Salience

The Effect Of Attention Orienting On Stereopsis

Strong Exogenous Attraction to Attention by Unique Eye of Origin -- Evidence for a Bottom-Up Saliency Map in the Primary Visual Cortex

Amodal Completion Impairs Stereoacuity Discrimination

Attentional Selection Within and Across Hemispheres: Implications for the Perceptual Load Theory

Contextual Influence on the Tilt After-Effect in Foveal and Para-Foveal Vision

Contextual Influence on Perceptual Judgment is Independent of the Eye of Origin of the Contextual Inputs: Implications for Extra-Striate Mechanisms

Stereoscopic Information Disrupts the Closure Grouping Effect in Discrimination Task but Not in Detection Task

The tilt illusion arises from an efficient reallocation of neural coding resources at the contextual boundary

Exploring the frame effect