Abstract:Purpose The two most used citation impact indicators in the assessment of scientific journals are, nowadays, the impact factor and the h -index. However, both indicators are not field normalized (vary heavily depending on the scientific category). Furthermore, the impact factor is not robust to the presence of articles with a large number of citations, while the h -index depends on the journal size. These limitations are very important when comparing journals of different sizes and categories. The purpose of this paper is to propose an alternative citation impact indicator, based on the percentage of highly cited articles in the journal. Design/methodology/approach This alternative indicator is empirically compared with the impact factor and the h -index, considering different time windows and citation percentiles (levels of citation for considering an article as highly cited compared to others in the same year and category). The authors use four journal categories (Clarivate Analytics Web of Science) which are quite different according to the publication profiles and citation levels ( Information Science & Library Science , Operations Research & Management Science , Ophthalmology , and Physics Condensed Matter ). Findings After analyzing 20 different indicators, depending on the citation percentile and the time window in which citations are counted, the indicator that seems to best homogenize the categories is the one that considers a time window of two years and a citation level of 10 percent. Originality/value The percentage of highly cited articles in a journal is field normalized (comparable between scientific categories), independent of the journal size and also robust to the presence of articles with a high number of citations.

Comparing study of three impact factors of journals in six subjects

The Statistic Analysis on Changes of Impact Factor of SHPS from Year 2000 to 2003

A Comparison among Citation-Based Journal Indicators and Their Relative Changes with Time

The Citation-Based Indicator and Combined Impact Indicator-New Options for Measuring Impact

Comparative Study on H-index Correlative Factors of Journal Papers Published by University Library

Probe into the New Indicators and Methods for the Evaluation on Humanities and Social Science Journals

On Ranking of Multidisciplinary Academic Journals by Weighted Multi-indicators

An Analysis of the International Academic Influence of Academic Journals in China over the Three Decades Since Reform and Opening Up

Research on the Correlation of Journal Evaluation Indicators

Analysis of Immediacy Index and Impact Factor of Journalism & Communication Academic Journals(2004—2006)

A Quantitative Evaluation System of Chinese Journals in the Humanities and Social Sciences

How to Calculate the Impact Factor of Chinese Journals of Social Sciences——Based on the Time Distribution of Citations of CSSCI

A probe into 66 factors which are possibly associated with the number of citations an article received

Statistic and Analysis of Medicine Journals with High Impact Factors Indexed by SCI

The Journal's Integrated Impact Index

An International Comparison of the Citation Impact of Chinese Journals with Priority Funding

The Journal’s Integrated Impact Index: a new indicator for journal evaluation

Experimental Study of Reversed Indicators of Citation Density

Factors of Influence Archival Science Journal Articles Highly Cited by Quantitative Research:Based on SPSS Statistical Analysis

A Synthetic Comparative Study of Academic and Altmetric Indicators Acting on Sin-gle Publication

An indicator of the impact of journals based on the percentage of their highly cited publications