Abstract:The concept of service government has gradually been universal after the high-tide of the western countries' Reinventing Government Movements since 1980. Under the guidance of service idea, administrative organ and other subjects who undertake the administrative tasks determine the forms and types of procedure with discretion in order to accomplish the administrative tasks better. On the one hand, the exercises of procedure discretion make a fuzzy bound between different administrative functions, and also destroy the application premises of the strict principle of legal reservation. In modern administration, intervention administration and supply administration often cooperate with each other perfectly to accomplish the hard administrative tasks flexibly. So it is unadvisable to defend the traditional absolute differentiation between intervention administration and supply administration and to apply the strict principle of legal reservation. On the other hand, the exercises of procedure discretion generate a new phenomenon that several administrative actions achieve one administrative target, which disclose the deficiency of the single administrative action form as the main analytical mean in administrative law. Hence the traditional theory of administrative law, which stereotypes administrative action and then judges its legality according to its constitutive requirements, will obstruct the dynamic administrative process artificially, and will obstruct the court to consider the whole and compound administrative actions comprehensively. To analyze this new type of administrative activity, we should not only abide by the law, but also pay attention to the guidance of the administrative purpose, which requires us to consider the whole administrative process with several administrative actions as dynamic administrative legal relationship, and to explore the compound legal status of administrative organs and other subjects who undertake the administrative tasks and administrative counterparts in interactive and pluralistic relationship. The legality of each administrative action should also be judged in dynamic administrative legal relationship.

On the Regulatory System of Planning Discretion

ON THE RATIONALITY AND THE LEGITIMACY OF THE PLANNING ADMINISTRATION

DISCRETIONARY POWER IN THE DEVELOPMENT CONTROL SYSTEM OF URBAN PLANNING

Innovating Regulatory Planning with Examples of American Zoning Regulations

On Self-regulation of Administrative Discretion

BUILDING LOCAL SPATIAL GROWTH-MANAGEMENT SYSTEM IN CHINA THROUGH REGULATORY DETAILED PLANNING

Planning Change and Right Relief Channel in Urban and Rural Planning:Study Focusing on Regulatory Planning

Solution of Disputes and Supervision of Powers: Dispute Solution in Laws Applying to Actions Against Administrative Agencies' Decisions

Study on Regulatory Plan

Urban Planning Inspection And Approval Improvement Strategies

Judicial Control of Administrative Discretionary Power

On Territorial Planning Reconfiguration in China: A Critical Review of the Existing Planning System

Trust Benefit Protection Principle In Regulatory Planning Adjustment

Effectiveness Regulation of Construction Land: Does Plan Matter?

On Constraints and Route-Construction of Administrative Discretion Standard-Making

Procedure Discretion under Service Idea and its Regulation…

REGULATORY DETAILED PLANNING IN CHINA: DILEMMA AND SOLUTION

A Strategic Approach to Contemporary Urban Planning in China:Assessment of Design-based and Strategy-based Planning in the Complex Urban System

Regulation by Soft Law of Administrative Discretion

Regulating judicial discretion on administrative penalty under clean government building

Exploration of Regulatory Detailed Planning in the age of Post Statutory Plan in Shenzhen