The Value of Diagnosis for Small Renal Carcinoma by Ultrasonic Contrast
Weiguo LI,Yiyong ZHU,Yuan RUAN,Juntao JIANG,Yifeng JING,Yi SHAO,Sanwei GUO,Xiaowen SUN,Jie FAN,Jun LU,Lianfang DU,Shujie XIA,Xiaoda TANG
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1001-1420.2009.01.012
2009-01-01
Journal of Clinical Urology
Abstract:Objective:To evaluate the value of diagnosis by ultrasonic contrast in small renal carcinoma,and to improve the diagnosis of small renal carcinoma.Methods:35 cases of small renal carcinoma from June 2005 to December 2007 in our hospital were reviewed to analyse the various kinds of imaging characteristic of ultrasonic,CT, IVP,MRI and ultrasonic contrast,and summarize the diagnostic experiences in such disease.Compared the diagnosis consequence between ultrasonic contrast and pathologic diagnosis.Compared the diagnosis consequence between ultrasonic contrast and enhanced CT.Evaluated the diagnosis value of ultrasonic contrast for small renal carcinoma.Results:In all cases the diagnosis accurate rate for small renal carcinoma:ultrasonic 82.9%,CT 91.7%,MRI 90.4%.35 cases of small renal carcinoma were examined by ultrasonic contrast:sensitivity 97.1%, specificity 100%,positive predictive value 100%,negative predictive value 50%,accurate rate 97.2%.Conclusions: The early diagnosis of small renal carcinoma mainly depends on ultrasonic and CT.Ultrasonic is the first-election for screening small renal carcinoma.multislice spiral CT offers the important reference value for the qualitation and level diagnosis of small renal carcinoma.Ultrasonic contrast possess higher sensitivity,specificity,positive predictive value and accurate rate for the diagnosis of small renal carcinoma.Ultrasonic contrast has a excellent diagnostic value in 35 cases of small renal carcinoma.