Abstract:PURPOSE:The study aimed to compare the diagnostic efficiency of contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) with that of contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CECT) in the evaluation of benign and malignant small renal masses (SRMs) (<4 cm) confirmed by pathology. METHODS:A total of 118 patients with 118 renal masses smaller than 4 cm diagnosed by both CEUS and CECT were enrolled in this study, including 25 benign lesions and 93 malignant lesions. All lesions were confirmed by histopathologic diagnosis after surgical resection. The diagnostic imaging studies of the patients were retrospectively reviewed by two independent ultrasonologists and two independent radiologists blinded to the CT or ultrasound findings and final histological results. All lesions on both CEUS and CECT were independently scored on a 3-point scale (1: benign, 2: equivocal, and 3: malignant). The concordance between interobserver agreement was interpreted using a weighted kappa statistic. The diagnostic efficiency of the evaluation of benign and malignant lesions was compared between CEUS and CECT. RESULTS:All the 118 included lesions were detected by both CEUS and CECT. In CEUS and CECT imaging evaluation of the 118 lesions, the weighted kappa value interpreting the concordance between interobserver agreement was 0.89 (95% CI 0.79-0.98) and 0.93 (95% CI 0.87-0.99), respectively. Both CEUS and CECT demonstrated good diagnostic performance in differential diagnosis of benign and malignant SRMs with sensitivity of 93.5% and 89.2%, specificity of 68% and 76%, PPV of 91.6% and 93.3%, NPV of 73.9% and 65.5%, and AUC of 0.808 and 0.826, respectively. There was no statistically significant difference in any of the diagnostic performance indices between these two methods (P > 0.05). However, the qualitative diagnosis of small papillary renal cell carcinoma (RCC) by CEUS was significantly better than that by CECT (P < 0.05), while there was no significant difference in qualitative diagnostic accuracy on other histotypes of SRMs between CEUS and CECT (P > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS:Both CEUS and CECT imaging modalities are effective for the differential diagnosis of benign and malignant SRMs. Furthermore, CEUS may be more effective than CECT for the qualitative diagnosis of small papillary RCC.

Comparative analysis of contrast-enhanced ultrasound and contrast-enhanced CT in diagnosis of small renal cell carcinoma

[Application Value of Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasonography for Assessing the High-Risk Population of Hepatic Malignant Tumor].

Contrast-enhanced Ultrasound for Differentiating Benign from Malignant Solid Small Renal Masses: Comparison with Contrast-Enhanced CT

Contrast-enhanced ultrasound diagnosis and differential diagnosis of small renal cell carcinoma

The Perfomance of Small Renal Cell Carcinoma with Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasonography

A Comparison Analysis of Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasonography and Contrast-Enhanced Computed-Tomography in the Diagnosis of Renal Lesions

The Value of Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound and Contrast-Enhanced Computed-Tomography in Diagnosis of Renal Cell Carcinoma Subtyping

The Value of Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound (CEUS) in Detecting Minute Renal Cell Carcinoma.

Diagnostic Value of Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound in Metastatic Adrenal Carcinoma

Contrast enhanced ultrasonography vs.contrast enhanced computed tomography for the diagnosis of focal lesions of the pancreas

The Diagnostic Value of Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound in Differentiating Small Renal Carcinoma and Angiomyolipoma

Comparative Study of Renal Pelvic Carcinoma by Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasonography and Contrast-Enhanced Computed Tomography

The value of contrast-enhanced ultrasound in the diagnosis of cystic renal cell carcinoma

Value of Contrast‐Enhanced Ultrasound in the Diagnosis of Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma: A Meta‐Analysis

The value of contrast-enhanced ultrasonography in subtypes differentiation of renal cell carcinoma

Application value of contrast-enhanced ultrasonography in diagnosis of renal cell carcinoma

The value of contrast-enhanced ultrasound in the differentiation of renal oncocytoma and chromophobe renal cell carcinoma

Diagnostic Value of Qualitative and Quantitative Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound for Pathological Subtypes of Small Solid Renal Masses

Characteristics Analysis of Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma by Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound

Imaging diagnosis of large renal tumors: Conventional ultrasonography versus contrast-enhanced ultrasound

The strategy for improving the detection of minute renal cell carcinoma with contrast-enhanced ultrasonography