Comparison of Three River Health Assessment Methods

Xiao-zhen ZENG,Yue CHE,E-nuo WU
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3321/j.issn:1000-4602.2007.04.026
2007-01-01
Abstract:A theoretical and empirical comparison of river health assessment methods of ISC from Australia,RCE from Sweden and URHA from China was made in respects of application objects,index selection,weight setting,standard enactment and results presentation.The results show that ISC,RCE and URHA differ by index selection,weight setting and standard enactment while they all apply comprehensive indices.For urban rivers,the assessment by RCE method is inaccurate,and some indices in ISC method prove difficult to make accurate assessment.URHA method is suitable for evaluating urban river,however,there are some respects to be improved,such as objective of index selection,adaptability of weight setting and standard enactment and variety of results presentation.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?