Abstract:There are at least three foundational relationships between the three conscious acts of intellect, emotion, and willing. Section 2 covers the structural foundational relationship (Brentano and Husserl in his early period): all conscious acts are intentional and can be divided into objectifying (intuition and representation) and non-objectifying acts (emotion and willing). Because a non-objectifying act cannot constitute an object, things must be based on objectifying acts and the object constituted by the latter; in this sense, a non-objectifying act is rooted in an objectifying one. Section 3 explains the genetic foundational issue with consciousness (Husserl in his later period, Scheler, and Heidegger): the stream of consciousness has its earliest origins and follows a process where it gradually unfolds. The earliest origin is the intentional willing, followed by nonintentional feelings, and, finally, the representation and thinking of willing. Intentional activity taking place afterward must be based on the conscious activity that has come already. Section 4 points out that, apart from the two aforementioned kinds of foundational relationships (i.e. structural and genetic), a third foundational relationship (i.e. dynamic) can also be found between the conscious acts of intellect, emotion, and willing in the Consciousness-only school (a Buddhist tradition in the East). In a continuous activity, the foundational relationship between the three aspects of intellect, emotion, and willing always remains encased in dynamic changes, and the change of primary and secondary roles (i.e. a change in the foundational relationship) could happen at any time. From this perspective, one can explain and resolve the confrontation and conflicts between the two former foundational relationships.

The Two Misunderstandings in Cognition: On Scientific Foundation of the Dialectical Materialism

The Dialectic Nature of the Activities in Science and Technology:the Unity of Reason and Unreason

Alain Badiou's Mistake: Two Postulates of Dialectic Materialism

Culture, dialectics, and reasoning about contradiction.

A Two-dimensional Analysis of Alienated Labor

The Entanglement of Psychologism and Logicism-To Review the Intellectual History of the Relevant Disputations between E. Husserl and W. Wundt

Discussion about the Triple Foundational Relationship between Intellect, Emotion, and Willing from the Perspective of the Phenomenology of Consciousness

Reason and Dialectics

A View on the Paradigm of the Dichotomy of Subject and Object in Psychology

The Role of Historical Materialism in "Un-concealment" in Historical Studies

The fundamental question of philosophy: Dialectics of the subject and object of cognition in German classical philosophy and Marxism

Concept Dimension of Historical Materialism:a New Interpretation

A Probe into the Development of Dialectical Logic

The Scientific Connotation of Historical Materialism and Its Practice and Development in the Context of the New Era

What's "the Spirit of Historical Materialism"

Bidirectional Isomorphism of Theory and Practice:Methodological Reflections on Bestowing Distinct Practical Features to Marxism of Contemporary China

The Methodology of Historical Materialism and Its Academic Significance: Starting with the Criticism of Some Social Critical Theories in the West

Surpassing and Transforming Enlightenment by Historical Materials

Leaping from Speculation to Science——on the Internal Logic of the Generation of Historical Materialism Through Marx' Theory of Alienation

Historical materialism in medieval China: The cases of Liu Zongyuan (773-819) and Li Gou (1009-1059)

Beyond Ideology of Progressivism: Disasterologic Perspective in Historical Materialism and Its Meanings