Abstract:The article discusses the development of digital technologies in criminal proceedings and the process of proving in criminal cases in the era of global digitalization. Among the aspects that make this theme relevant are the dynamic development of information technologies, the conservatism and tradition of the criminal process, and the lack of proper regulation on this issue. The author aims at defining the concept of “electronic evidence”, specifying the list criteria for electronic evidence admissibility in Russian and foreign practice, and establishing the specifics of collecting evidence. The research methodology includes general and private methods of cognition: dialectical, formal-logical, comparative-legal, systemic, analysis and synthesis. The article provides an analysis of various perspectives of electronic evidence: electronic evidence is physical evidence; electronic evidence as belonging to other documents; electronic evidence as information in an electronic digital format obtained from a person, object or process and recorded on any material medium. The author adheres to the fourth position, according to which electronic evidence is an independent type of evidence, with its special form, media, mechanism of formation, and method of transformation into evidence. Providing examples of the use of electronic evidence in the Russian and foreign law enforcement practice, the author indicates their advantages and disadvantages and emphasizes that the complex storing, processing and transmitting digital information in an unchanged form determines the criteria for electronic evidence admissibility. Like other types of evidence, electronic one must meet the criteria of reliability, admissibility, and relevance. In addition, digital evidence should be subject to identification, authentication, verifiability, be complete (immutable) and reproducible. In conclusion, the author dwells on the peculiarities of collecting evidence, which should be enshrined in criminal procedural legislation: a) compliance with the general principles of collecting evidence; b) mandatory participation of a specialist; c) no actions causing a change in digital evidence before and during its collection; d) documenting all actions related to the collection, storage, access or transfer of digital evidence; e) responsibility of an official working with electronic evidence for all activities with it; e) ensuring the proper transmission or transportation of digital evidence, as well as appropriate conditions for its storage, depending on the category of information it contains.

On the Scientific Foundation for the Time Determination of Electronic Evidence

A Survey of Digital Passive Lossless Forensics on Forged and Altered Document

Public Cases, Authentication Opinions, and Amendments to Law of Criminal Procedure

Research on methodology of time serial data mining

Research on the Rules of Electronic Evidence in Chinese Criminal Proceedings

A Study on The Current Status of Electronic Evidence Preservation in Internet Crime

Ensuring the Authenticity and Non-Misuse of Data Evidence in Digital Forensics

Electronic evidence in the blockchain era: New rules on authenticity and integrity

The Analysis on the Power to Prove of Electronic Evidence

Electronic evidence and its authenticity in forensic evidence

Analyze on Countermeasures to Delay of Evidence Submission in Civil Procedures

The Time Dimension of Science: Connecting the Past to the Future

On the Concept of Electronic Evidence and the Criteria for Their Admissibility

Chronos: Secure and Accurate Time-Stamping Scheme for Digital Files Via Blockchain.

Electronic Evidence in the Criminal Procedure Code: To Be or not to Be?

On the Legitimation of Scientific Evidence

Secure Combination of Untrusted Time information Based on Optimized Dempster-Shafer Theory

Research on the Anti-counterfeiting Technology and Its Information System for Evidence Digital Images

Electronic Evidence

On the Design of Time-Stamped Signatures

Protecting the Integrity of Digital Evidence and Basic Human Rights During the Process of Digital Forensics