Abstract:There is growing awareness of reproducibility concerns within the scientific literature; whilst journals continue to be filled with seemingly beautiful results, teams of researchers are lifting the lid on the veracity of scientific claims and the replicability of findings in a growing number of disciplines. Highlighting the global scale of this issue, the Open Science Collaboration (<a href="#">2015</a>) performed direct replications of 100 psychological research studies and found that whilst 97% of the original studies reported significant results, this declined to 36% for replications of these. Moreover, the average effect size of the replications was half the magnitude of the average across original studies. Several human decision-making factors have been proposed to underlie irreproducibility, such as selective reporting and questionable research practices (QRPs; Simmons et al. <a href="#">2011</a>; John et al. <a href="#">2012</a>) fueled by pressures to achieve novel, surprising results and incentive structures that reward quantity over quality (Giner-Sorolla <a href="#">2012</a>; Frith <a href="#">2020</a>; Munafò et al. <a href="#">2020</a>). As can be seen in <a href="#F0001">Figure 1</a>, there are many threats that can arise at each stage of the hypothetico-deductive scientific process, which can undermine the robustness of published research and constrain knowledge accumulation. In their 'manifesto for reproducible science', Munafò et al. (<a href="#">2017</a>) propose five measures that target these threats with the goal of improving research: (1) methods, (2) reporting and dissemination, (3) reproducibility, (4) evaluation, and (5) incentives. Adoption of open science practices will allow many of these measures to be achieved and calls for their implementation in addiction science are becoming louder (Heirene <a href="#">2021</a>; Louderback et al. <a href="#">2021</a>; Pennington et al. <a href="#">2021</a>). However, to be successful, academic journals also need to adapt and recentre their focus on scientific rigor rather than the metamorphosis of study results. In this Editorial, we introduce two types of Registered Reports (RRs) that satisfy all these measures and highlight our commitment by offering these publishing tracks to authors through ART. We first outline the 'traditional' RR format (which ART has offered since 2019) and its associated advantages, followed by the introduction of a new initiative launched in April 2021 – Peer Community In Registered Reports (PCI RR).

Readers' Comments to the New Researchers' Committee Report

Welcoming JNeurosci's Early Career Researcher Advisory Board

Engaging actively with issues in the responsible conduct of science: lessons from international efforts are relevant for undergraduate education in the United States

White Paper on Improvements to the NASA Research and Analysis Proposal and Review System

Response to NITRD, NCO, NSF Request for Information on "Update to the 2016 National Artificial Intelligence Research and Development Strategic Plan"

Astro2020 APC White Paper: Providing a Timely Review of Input Demographics to Advisory Committees

Promoting a more diverse and inclusive research workforce through the research scholars program

A new approach to mentoring for research careers: the National Research Mentoring Network

Including Early Career Researchers in Scientific Publishing

Critical Issues: Reading and the New Literacy Studies: Reframing the National Academy of Sciences Report on Reading

Nontargeted Analysis Study Reporting Tool: A Framework to Improve Research Transparency and Reproducibility

The National Early Literacy Panel Report: Summary, Commentary, and Reflections on Policies and Practices to Improve Children’s Early Literacy

Survey-Based Analysis of a Science of Science Communication Scientific Interest Group: Member Feedback and Perspectives on Science Communication

Highlighting the NIAID Radiation and Nuclear Countermeasures Program’s Commitment to Training and Diversifying the Radiation Workforce

Training the Next Generation of Astronomers

Fostering Responsible Conduct of Research for Early-Stage Investigators: Challenges and Opportunities

Report from Dagstuhl Seminar 23031: Frontiers of Information Access Experimentation for Research and Education

Reshaping the publication process: Addiction Research and Theory joins Peer Community In Registered Reports

Replies to commentaries on beyond playing 20 questions with nature

Data Management in Integrated Research Institutes: Undertaking a Review of Research Data Management at the Rosalind Franklin Institute

Fine-Tuning Summer Research Programs to Promote Underrepresented Students' Persistence in the STEM Pathway