The National Early Literacy Panel Report: Summary, Commentary, and Reflections on Policies and Practices to Improve Children’s Early Literacy

Anne Mcgill-Franzen
Abstract:Based on a growing awareness of the importance of the early years and a concomitant understanding of the seemingly intractable literacy achievement gap during the school years between children of poverty or nondominant cultures and those of more economically advantaged and mainstream communities, the National Institute for Literacy convened an expert panel—the National Early Literacy Panel (NELP)—to identify and synthesize the relevant research on the early precursors to school success in literacy. The panel’s report, Developing Early Literacy (NELP, 2008; available at http://www.nifl.gov/earlychildhood/NELP/NELPreport.html) is the subject of this special issue of Educational Researcher (ER). Its methodology and major findings are summarized for the special issue by Timothy Shanahan, chair of the panel, and Christopher Lonigan (pp. 279–285). The nine contributors who comment on the NELP report for this special issue have a long-standing commitment to the early literacy field; they also have broad-based research expertise, an understanding of early literacy practice, and a grasp of the ways in which policy reports, such as the NELP report, if left unexamined, can influence research and pedagogy with unintended consequences. The views of these authors as well as those of the panel are widely respected, and their insight is critical, particularly now as early literacy policy is taking shape on a national level. In their rejoinder to the commentaries Lonigan and Shanahan (this issue of ER pp. 340–346) acknowledge the gaps in what we know about early literacy development but submit that the report reflects the extant research base in the field. Every member of NELP, as well as critics of the report, recognizes the power that literacy confers on individuals—to say transformative is to sound clichéd—but power it is, and that is why we care, why we study, and why we argue and write.
Sociology,Education
What problem does this paper attempt to address?