Comparison of two treatment methods following uterine artery embolization (UAE) in patients with caesarean scar pregnancy (CSP): laparoscopy/hysteroscopy-combined surgery versus uterine curettage
Xin Wu,HE Yi-feng,WU Xue-zhe,XUE Xiao-hong,Ru Lin,Ying Yuan,Qing Wang
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1672-8467.2013.04.014
2013-01-01
Abstract:Objective: To find more safer and effective treatment methods for caesarean scar pregnancy (CSP) after uterine artery embolization (UAE), we compared laparoscopy and hysteroscopy-combined surgery with uterine curettage. Methods: Fifty-eight patients were enrolled from three medical centers in Shanghai, China from Mar. 2004 through Aug. 2010, who were divided into two cohorts: 25 received intra-arterial methotrexate (MTX)+UAE+laparoscopy and hysteroscopy-combined surgery (research group), and 33 received intra-arterial methotrexate (MTX)+UAE+uterine curettage (control group). The baseline characters, surgical clearance rates, complications, operation times, durations of hospitalization and recovery qualities of patients from these two groups were compared. Results: The first-time clearance rate of the patients in the research group reached 100%, while the mean blood loss during operation was 78.0 mL. The patients in the control group were cured with single or multiple uterine curettages except for one case whose uterus was removed due to the uterine perforation. The first-time clearance rate was 82% (P=0.024) and the mean blood loss was 258.5 mL (P=0.004) in the control group, which were both significantly inferior to those of the research group. On the hospital stay and β-hCG regression time, the research group was much better than the control group (P=0.43 and P=0.033, respectively). On the post-surgical recovery qualities, the patients from the research group had significantly lower rates of abnormal abdominal pain, vaginal bleeding and menstruation compared with those of the control group. Conclusions: As a successive medical measure following the UAE in the treatment of CSP, the safety, effectiveness and therapeutic radicalness of the laparoscopy and hysteroscopy-combined surgery are much higher than those of the traditional uterine curettage, indicating it can be used a routine scenario in the clinic.