Long-term outcome of thoracic outlet syndrome: a comparison of classic and modified scalenectomy

陈琳,蔡佩琴,彭峰,陈德松
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.issn.1005-054x.2005.06.002
2005-01-01
Abstract:Objective With follow-up of surgically treated thoracic outlet syndrome (TOS) for longer than 5 years, results of classic and modified scalenectomy were compared. Methods 29 sides of TOS in 26 patients treated from 1985 to 1994 underwent classic scalenectomy (division of the anterior and middle scalenius muscles plus excision of the cervical rib or prolonged C_7 transverse process if existed). From 1996 to 2000, 30 sides of TOS in 28 patients were treated with modified scalenectomy (division of the anterior, middle, and minimal scalenius muscles plus adventitia stripping of the subclavicular artery and neurolysis of the lower trunk if there existed cold intolerance and pale of the limb). Atrophy of the intrinsic muscles, numbness at the ulnar side of the hand and forearm, discomfort of the shoulder and neck region, cold and pale of upper extremities were assessed pre-and post-operatively in these 2 groups. Follow-up ranged from 5 to 19 years. Results The improvement rate for atrophy of the intrinsic muscles, numbness at the ulnar side of the hand and forearm in the classic group and modified group were 80.0%/88. 8%,80. 8%/ 85.2%,88.5%/92.0% respectively. There was no significant difference between the two groups. The improvement rate for discomfort of the shoulder and neck region, cold and pale of upper extremities in the classic group and modified group were 47.l%/80.0%,44.4%/78.9% respectively. The difference between the two groups was statistically significant. Conclusion Compared with classic scalenectomy, modified scalenectomy had higher improvement rate for TOS symptoms, especially for discomfort of the shoulder and neck region, and cold and pale of upper extremities.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?