Comparison of three methods in the detection of tuberculosis and analysis of drug resistance in clinical isolates of Mycobacterium

Chen Jianbo,Huang Tonghua,Chen Yujun,Wu Chi,Xiao Yanyu,Luo Kai,Ye Feidi
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1673-4130.2012.04.017
2012-01-01
Abstract:Objective To compare of three methods in tuberculosis detection and analyze the drug resistance of Mycobacterium isolats.Methods The results of smear-microscopy,Mycobacterium culture,and PCR detection of patients with definite diagnosis of tuberculosis in Shenzhen Third People's Hospital between 2009 and 2010 were analyzed,including the species of Mycobacterium and drug resistance.Results Total 640 hospitalized patients with well medical records were enrolled in this study,including 537 cases of pulmonary tuberculosis,82 of tuberculosis pleurisy and 21 of tuberculosis meningitis,the positive rates of smear-microscopy of whom were 44.1%,5.3% and 13.3%,of Mycobacterium-culture were 59.9%,12.9% and 30.0%,and of PCR detection were 52.2%,16.7% and 26.3% respectively.Species of Mycobacterium were made up with 67.0% of Mycobacterium tuberculosis,16.8% of Mycobacterium bovis and 16.2% of Mycobacterium other than tuberculosis,which were confirmed by Mycobacterium isolates identification.The drug resistance of Mycobacterium tuberculosis to Rifampin,Isoniazid,Ethambutol and Streptomycin were 16.7%,15.1%,4.8% and 15.9% respectively.Conclusion The main laboratory diagnostic methods of tuberculosis were smear-microscopy,Mycrobacterium-culture and PCR detection at present in Shenzhen,and most common pathogens that cause tuberculosis were Mycobacterium tuberculosis with high level drug resistance to three mainly used anti-tuberculosis drugs presently.In addition,about 40% tuberculosis patients were negative with Mycobacterium,bringing difficulties to identify active tuberculosis and old inactive tuberculosis,indicating that new and advanced diagnostic methods should be further researched.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?