DK Crush Technique for Treatment of True Coronary Bifurcation Lesions: Comparison with Classical Crush Technique

CHEN Shaoliang,FANG Weiyi,WEI Meng,HE Ben,ZHANG Ruiyan,CHEN Yundai,ZHANG Junjie,YE Fei,ZHU Zhongsheng,LIN Song,SHAN Shoujie,YANG Song,QIAN Yun,Damras,Michael Lee,Tan Huaycheem,Tejas Patel

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1004-8812.2007.02.001

2007-01-01

Abstract:Objective To evaluate the effect of modified DK Crush technique with double kissing and double Crush on the procedural success rate for bifurcation coronary lesion. Methods and Results This is a consecutive, non-randomized, open-label study. Eighty-eight consecutive patients with single true coronary bifurcation lesion according to Lefevre Classification and side branch diameter 2.0 mm were enrolled into the study. The first 44 patients (from October 2004 to January 2005) and the later 44 patients (from February 2005 to June 2005) were assigned to receive classical Crush and DK Crush technique, respectivelly. Data before and within 30 days after the operation were analyzed. Patients in the DK Crush group, compared with those in the classical Crush group, were characterized by longer lesion length in side branch (13.5±3.4 mm vs 7.8±3.1 mm, P0.05), shorter procedural time (44±12 min vs 68±17 min, P0.05 ), higher success rate of FKBI (100% vs 70%,P0.01) and lower volume of contrast consummed (102±38 mm vs 176±46 mm, P0.05). There was a tendency that patients in the DK Crush group had larger bifurication angle between the main vessel and side branch [(57±18)°vs (47±15)°] and longer lesion length in the main vessel (24.3±8.6 mm vs 21.1±7.3 mm) although without significant differences (P0.05, respectivelly). Sub-acute stent thrombosis were detected in 2 patients with failure of FKBI in the classical Crush group (4.3%). Patients in the classical Crush group, compared with those in the DK Crush group, were characterized by smaller minimum lumen diameter (MLD) at side branch ostium (2.74±0.12 mm vs 3.01±0.13 mm,P0.01) and higher degree of residual stenosis at ostial side branch (17.4±11.2% vs 7.3%±8.6%,P0.05).Notably, there were five patients whose residual diameter restenosis at ostial side branch was 30%, which was defined as failure of the operation. Conclusion Comparing with classical Crush, DK Crush has the potential to improve the clinical outcomes in patients with coronary bifurcation lesions. Further random, prospective, multi-center study is required to confirm these differences between the classical Crush and the DK Crush techniques.