Abstract:Background: Whether single or double stent implantation is the optimal stenting strategy in coronary artery bifurcation lesions is unknown. Objective: To compare the efficacy and safety of DK crush (DK) versus provisional stenting technique (PT) for the treatment of coronary artery bifurcation lesions. Design, time and setting: Non-randomized, controlled and prospective experiment was performed at the Nanjing First Hospital between August 2006 and April 2007. Participants: Sixty-two patients with true coronary bifurcation lesions (branch diameter > 2.0 mm by visual estimation) were enrolled. Thirty-two patients were treated by PT and the other patients undergoing DK. Methods: Only Rapamycin eluting-stents were allowed to be implanted. T stent, Culotte stent or Reverse crush stent could be used if there was still more than 50% residual stenosis or dissection that could affect blood flow in PT group following routine implantation. DK group only underwent routine stent implantation. Main outcome measures: Quantifying coronary angiography dada were analyzed before and immediately after percutaneous coronary intervention as well as at 6-9 months follow-up. Major adverse cardiovascular events were recorded by telephone call after 1 year. Results: There were no significant differences between two groups in terms of baseline characteristics (P > 0.05). Patients in the DK group compared with those in the PT group were characterized by larger minimum lumen diameter at branch ostium (P < 0.01) and smaller residual stenosis (P < 0.01). At 6-9 months follow-up, no statistically significant differences were identified in minimum lumen diameter (P < 0.01), residual stenosis (P < 0.01) and late lumen loss in main vessel, but it tented to be higher in PT group compared with DK group (P > 0.05). There were no major adverse cardiovascular events developed during hospitalization in both groups. At 1 year follow-up, 1 major adverse cardiovascular event occurred in DK group and 4 developed in PT group (P > 0.05). Conclusion: Both DK crush and provisional stenting techniques are effective and safe for the treatment of coronary bifurcation lesions. But DK crush shows superior over provisional stenting because it can effectively reduce incidence of restenosis and major adverse cardiovascular events.

[Comparison of DK Crush with Classical Crush Technique with Drug-Eluting Stents for the Treatment of Coronary Bifurcation Lesions from DKCRUSH-1 Study].

Study comparing the double kissing (DK) crush with classical crush for the treatment of coronary bifurcation lesions: the DKCRUSH-1 Bifurcation Study with drug-eluting stents

DK crush (double-kissing and double-crush) technique for treatment of true coronary bifurcation lesions: illustration and comparison with classic crush.

A randomized clinical study comparing double kissing crush with provisional stenting for treatment of coronary bifurcation lesions: results from the DKCRUSH-II (Double Kissing Crush versus Provisional Stenting Technique for Treatment of Coronary Bifurcation Lesions) trial.

A Randomized Clinical Study Comparing Double Kissing Crush With Provisional Stenting for Treatment of Coronary Bifurcation Lesions

Double Kissing Crush Versus Provisional Stenting for Left Main Distal Bifurcation Lesions: DKCRUSH-V Randomized Trial.

Coronary Bifurcation Lesions Treated with Double Kissing Crush Technique Compared to Classical Crush Technique: Serial Intravascular Ultrasound Analysis.

Serial Intravascular Ultrasound Analysis Comparing Double Kissing And Classical Crush Stenting For Coronary Bifurcation Lesions

Final kissing balloon inflation by classic crush stenting did not improve the clinical outcomes for the treatment of unprotected left main bifurcation lesions: the importance of double-kissing crush technique.

Comparison of intravascular ultrasound-guided with angiography-guided double kissing crush stenting for patients with complex coronary bifurcation lesions: Rationale and design of a prospective, randomized, and multicenter DKCRUSH VIII trial

Study on DK crush versus provisional stenting technique for treatment of coronary artery bifurcation lesions

Design and rationale for the treatment effects of provisional side branch stenting and DK crush stenting techniques in patients with unprotected distal left main coronary artery bifurcation lesions (DKCRUSH V) Trial

Clinical Outcome of Double Kissing Crush Versus Provisional Stenting of Coronary Artery Bifurcation Lesions

Twenty-four-month Update on Double-Kissing Crush Stenting of Bifurcation Lesions.

Comparison of double kissing crush versus Culotte stenting for unprotected distal left main bifurcation lesions: results from a multicenter, randomized, prospective DKCRUSH-III study.

DK Crush Technique: Modified Treatment of Bifurcation Lesions in Coronary Artery

3-Year Outcomes of the DKCRUSH-V Trial Comparing DK Crush with Provisional Stenting for Left Main Bifurcation Lesions.

Randomized Comparison of FFR-Guided and Angiography-Guided Provisional Stenting of True Coronary Bifurcation Lesions: the DKCRUSH-VI Trial (double Kissing Crush Versus Provisional Stenting Technique for Treatment of Coronary Bifurcation Lesions VI).

Classic crush and DK crush stenting techniques.

Clinical Outcome after DK Crush Versus Culotte Stenting of Distal Left Main Bifurcation Lesions