Evaluation of Different Type Swan-Neck Dialysis Catheters on Patients with Peritoneal Dialysis

ZHOU Yan,LI Jian-dong,ZHOU Ting-ting,WANG Hao,LI Shi-jun,TANG Zheng,LIU Zhi-hong,YU Yu-sheng
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1006-298x.2011.03.007
2011-01-01
Abstract:Objective:To compare the effects of different types of swan-neck dialysis catheter performance and complications in patients with peritoneal dialysis and explore the indications for different catheter.Methodology:From March 2007 to February 2010,three hundred and fifty eight patients with ambulatory peritoneal dialysis were retrospectively investigated.According to the different types of the catheter,they were divided into two groups:swan-neck straight(n=231) and coiled(n=127) group.Two groups of patients were followed up for more than three months.The dialysate flow rate,catheter dislocation,tunnel infection,exit infection,and the incidence of dialysate leakage were observed.Results:There was no difference in age and primary disease of two groups;and also no difference in dialysate exit infection and tunnel rate infection(P0.05).The catheter displacement occurred in 7 cases(3.0%) of straight group while in as many as 26 cases(20.4%) of the coiled group,and it was significant difference between two groups(P0.01).The self-reset rate,need to re-catheterization in swan-neck straight patients was less.In addition to swan-neck straight,the dislocation rate was low when the pubic symphysis 11cm as a location mark.Conclusion:The different types of swan-neck catheters have advantages and disadvantages,swan-neck coiled catheter displacement rate is high,it is not suitable for Chinese patients with ESRD.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?