A Study of the Clinical Utility and Safety of Rotational Angiography in the Diagnosis of Coronary Artery Disease

韩志华,何奔,何清,邵琴,葛恒,龚兴荣,江立生,张清,刘建平,厉锦华,周炜,谢文毅,刘佳俊
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1001-1439.2009.12.005
2009-01-01
Journal of Clinical Cardiology
Abstract:Objective:This study evaluates the safety and clinical utility of rotational angiography in the diagnosis of coronary artery disease.Method:We prospectively randomized 60 patients referred for diagnostic coronary angiography to either standard angiography(SA)or rotational angiography(RA).Contrast and radiation utilization were compared between the two groups.Result:Rotational angiography was successfully completed in all subjects.There was a 18% reduction in contrast utilization in the rotational group as compared to the standard group([62.16±15.03] vs [76.91±20.00]ml,P=0.042).Additionally,for LCA,there was a 23% reduction in total radiation exposure in the rotational group as compared to the standard group([24.403 4±8.115 0]vs [31.886 1±12.944 9] Gycm2,P=0.0188),and for RCA,there was a 27% reduction in total radiation exposure in the rotational group as compared to the standard group([3.993 6±2.089]vs [5.486 9±2.500 2] Gycm2,P=0.0263).Procedure time tended to be shorter for rotational angiography([353.9±146.7] vs [396.8±165.8]s;P=0.2).Conclusion:Rotational coronary angiography can be rapidly performed in any patient and provides a significant reduction in contrast and radiation utilization while at the same time providing adequate angiographic data to complement or replace standard coronary angiography in the evaluation of coronary artery disease.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?