Abstract:We develop a dynamic equilibrium model to derive the endogenous relations among firms’ ownership structures, managerial incentives, and asset returns. Ownership concentration is positively related to managerial incentives (PPS) but is negatively related to its expected stock (dollar) return, and volatility. If initial block ownership is above (below) its steady-state level, block ownership and managerial PPS decrease (increase) over time to their steady-state levels, whereas the expected stock returns, return volatilities, and the price impacts of block trades increase (decrease). The convergence of these variables to their respective steady-state levels is faster for firms that are less productive, that are riskier, and whose earnings are more sensitive to managerial actions. The price impact of block trades is larger in firms that are more productive and smaller in firms whose earnings are more sensitive to managerial actions. Changes in the expected stock return over time are negatively affected by changes in block ownership but positively affected by changes in managerial incentives. Relative to owner-managed firms, more widely owned firms have lower expected stock returns and volatilities, faster dispersion of block ownership, and smaller but more variable price impacts of block trades. Compared with diffusely owned firms, firms with significant blockholdings have lower expected stock returns, higher return volatilities, and less powerful managerial incentives. This paper was accepted by Tomasz Piskorski, finance. Funding: H. W. (H.) Jung and Q. Zeng received an internal research grant (AUD 15,000) in 2015 from the Faculty of Business and Economics at the University of Melbourne. Supplemental Material: The data files and online appendices are available at https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2023.4696 .

Ambiguity Aversion and the Puzzle of Own-Company Stock in Pension Plans ∗

Ambiguity aversion and household portfolio choice puzzles: Empirical evidence

A Strategic Asset Pricing Model for Relative Performance Concern

Myopic Loss Aversion or Equate-to-differentiate Heuristic? A Heuristic Decision Making Model for Both Single and Aggregated Plays.

Ambiguity attitudes for real-world sources: field evidence from a large sample of investors

Return Ambiguity, Portfolio Choice, and Asset Pricing

Learning , Ambiguity and Life-Cycle Portfolio Allocation ∗

Why Do Employees Like to Be Paid with Options?: A Multi-Period Prospect Theory Approach

Dynamic Asset Allocation with Ambiguous Return Predictability

Portfolio Concentration, Portfolio Inertia, and Ambiguous Correlation

Stochastic model of a pension plan

Ambiguity Aversion and Experiential Learning: Implications for Retirement Planning

Nash Equilibrium Strategy for a DC Pension Plan with State-Dependent Risk Aversion: A Multiperiod Mean-Variance Framework

Investment Decisions Under Ambiguity: Evidence from Mutual Fund Investor Behavior

Why Stocks May Disappoint

Ambiguity aversion and experiential learning: implications for long-term savings decisions

Ownership Structure, Incentives, and Asset Returns

Robust portfolio choice for a DC pension plan with inflation risk and mean-reverting risk premium under ambiguity

Equilibrium behavioral strategy for a DC pension plan with piecewise linear state-dependent risk tolerance

Incentive Contracting under Ambiguity Aversion

Managers' Investment Timing Decisions under Endogenous Compensation Contracts