Abstract:Accurately identifying the boundary of urban clusters is a crucial aspect of studying the development of urban agglomerations. This process is essential for comprehending and optimizing smart and compact urban development. Existing studies often rely on a single category of data, which can result in coarse identification boundaries, insufficient detail accuracy, and slight discrepancies between the coverage and the actual conditions. To accurately identify the extent of urban clusters, this study proposes and compares the results of three methods for identifying dense urban areas of three major agglomerations in China: Beijing–Tianjin–Hebei, the Yangtze River Delta, and the Guangdong–Hong Kong–Macao Greater Bay Area. The study then integrates the results of these methods to obtain a more effective identification approach. The social economic method involved extracting a density threshold based on the fused nuclear density of socio-economic vitality data, including population, GDP, and POI, while the remote sensing method evaluated feature indices based on remote sensing images, including the density index, continuity index, gradient index, and development index. The traffic network method utilizes land transportation networks and travelling speeds to identify the minimum cost path and delineate the boundary by 20–30 min isochronous circles. The results obtained from the three methods were combined, and hotspots were identified using GIS overlay analysis and spatial autocorrelation analysis. This method integrates the multi-layered information from the previous three methods, which more comprehensively reflects the characteristics and morphology of urban clusters. Finally, the accuracy of each identification result is verified and compared. The results reveal that the average overall accuracy (OA) of the three areas delineated by the first three methods are 57.49%, 30.88%, and 33.74%, respectively. Furthermore, the average Kappa coefficients of these areas are 0.4795, 0.2609, and 0.2770, respectively. After performing data fusion, the resulting average overall accuracy (OA) was 85.34%, and the average Kappa coefficient was 0.7394. These findings suggest that the data fusion method can effectively delineate dense urban areas with greater accuracy than the previous three methods. Additionally, this method can accurately reflect the scope of urban clusters by depicting their overall boundary contour and the distribution of internal details in a more scientific manner. The study proposes a feasible method and path for the identification of urban clusters. It can serve as a starting point for formulating spatial planning policies for urban agglomerations, aiding in precise and scientific control of boundary growth. This can promote the rational allocation of resources and optimization of spatial structure by providing a reliable reference for the optimization of urban agglomeration space and the development of regional spatial policies.

Economic Space Evaluation of the 16 Urban Agglomerations in China:From the Perspective of New Economic Geography

Urban Concrete Forest: China’s 3D Urban Expansion over the Last Three Decades

Analyzing he Economic Space of Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei Megalopolis from the“D” Perspective

DENSITY,DISTANCE AND DIVISION FOR URBAN AGGLOMERATION DEVELOPMENT——THE CASE OF WUHAN CITY REGION

Study on Intercity Differences of Chinese Urban Economic Efficiency and Its Spatial - Temporal Characteristics: Base on 273 Cities at Prefecture Level or above in China

Assessment and spatial effect of urban agglomeration business environments: A case study of two urban agglomerations in China

Patterns of Typical Chinese Urban Agglomerations Based on Complex Spatial Network Analysis

An Evaluation of China’s Urban Agglomeration Development from the Spatial Perspective

The Regional Difference and its Inlfuence Mechanism of Land Economical Density in Central Plains Economic Zone

Economic spatial structure of China's urban agglomerations: Regional differences, distribution dynamics, and convergence

Density,Distance,Division,and Urban Labor Productivity:Empircal Study Based on Panel Data of 277 Chinese Cities During 2004-2009

Land Spatial Development Based on Carrying Capacity, Land Development Potential, and Efficiency of Urban Agglomerations in China

Spatial-temporal differentiation of urban eco-efficiency and its driving factors: A comparison of five major urban agglomerations in China

Land use efficiency and influencing factors of urban agglomerations in China

From global to national: The role of urban agglomerations in China's new development paradigm

An approach for urban agglomerations integration evaluation based on multivariate big data: case of the Central Plains Urban Agglomeration

Identification of Urban Clusters Based on Multisource Data—An Example of Three Major Urban Agglomerations in China

Impact of Population Density on Spatial Differences in the Economic Growth of Urban Agglomerations: The Case of Guanzhong Plain Urban Agglomeration, China

Spatial Pattern, and Evolution of China’s Urban Agglomerations

Spatio-Econometric Analysis of Urban Land Use Efficiency in China from the Perspective of Natural Resources Input and Undesirable Outputs: A Case Study of 287 Cities in China

Integrating Gaussian Mixture Dual-Clustering and DBSCAN for Exploring Heterogeneous Characteristics of Urban Spatial Agglomeration Areas