Abstract:The abolition of the judicial interpretation issued by the Supreme People's Court of the People's Republic of China in Qi Yuling's case marks the end of the trend of developing a judicial constitutional review system in China, but issues of courts invoking constitutional norms in judicial decisions continue to arise. This essay investigates the actual situation of the Constitution in judicial decisions by categorizing 1907 court decisions that invoked the Constitution as the reasoning basis and the court decisions which invoked the Constitution as the decision-making basis and by exploring the logic of the use of the Constitution by Chinese judges. In the absence of a constitutional review system, the primary sense of Chinese judges invoking constitutional norms is characterized by "simplistic reasoning ", "politicized enforcement " and the "parent law " concept. The insufficient judgment reason is a universal feature of judicial adjudication in Chinese courts. However, due to the lack of a constitutional review system, the poor perception of the interpretation and application of the constitution may exacerbate the lack of legal arguments invoked by the Constitution. The political model of Constitution enforcement in China makes judges invoke the Constitution in judicial decisions by "asserting the prestige of the Constitution ", which leads to numerous errors in legal argumentation in judicial decisions. This also reflects the tendency of "political enforcement " to take precedence over the legal enforcement of the Constitution. The influence of the old "parent law " concept is that judges can arbitrarily apply constitutional norms directly to civil cases, including fundamental rights norms. By summarizing and describing the above three features, we can depict the activities of current Chinese courts in invoking the Constitution.

How is a Judgment made?——The Study of the Mode of Judicial Judgment in the Context of Country

Mode of the Judge Thinking

The Boundary of “Collecting Mistakes Whenever Discovered”

On Administrative Litigation's Performing Legal Duty Judgment

Judge's Strategy of Settling Lawsuits

A Court Judgment As Dialogue

Attribution and Judicial Control in Chinese Court Judgments: a Corpus-Based Study

Gauging Court Adjudication: Qualification And Quantification

A Corpus-Based Interpretation of the Discourse–cognitive–society Triangle on Chinese Court Judgments

Civil Procedural Duties System in the Modern Society: A Research on the Different Roles of Judges and Parties in Clarifying Facts of Cases

Local Society,Ethical Traditions,Practice on the Rule of Law and Active Justice

On Judgement System of Administrative Confirmation

Revisiting Judgment Translation in Hong Kong

New Exploration the Scope of Judge's Clarification Power

How Do Chinese Judges Invoke the Constitution? Analysis Based on 1907 Decisions

Judgment and Public Opinion--And Compare the Ways that Chinese and American Judges deal with Public Opinions

A Critical Discourse Analysis of the Civil Judgment of “The Besieged City” Copyright Infringement Case

On Logical Ground of Justice of Judicial Judgment

On the Effect of Judged Facts

A Pragmatic Turn In The Interpretation Of Court Judgments

Analysis on the Types of Administrative Litigation——Taking the Administrative Trials in Zhangzhou As an Example