A Clinical Comparative Study of Percutaneous Cannulated Screw Versus Plate Fixation for Posterior Ankle Fractures

LEI Lei,YANG Tie-yi,WANG Zhi,ZHENG Shi-wei,LIU Shu-yi,LIU Yue
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1674-6309.2012.08.009
2012-01-01
Abstract:Objective To compare the functional and radiographic outcomes of percutaneous cannulated screw and plate fixation in treatment of patients with posterior ankle fractures.Methods From January 2006 to March 2012,84 patients with posterior ankle fractures were treated with percutaneous cannulated screw or plate fixation.Their functional and radiographic outcomes were reviewed to compare the differences in bone union time,full weight-bearing time,American orthopaedic foot and ankle society(AOFAS) scores and complications.Results 84 cases had complete follow-up records and a mean follow-up of 16.2 months(range,12 to 23 months).11 complications occurred in the cannulated screw fixation group.The mean full weight-bearing time and radiographic bone union time were 10.8 and 9.1 weeks respectively in the cannulated screw fixation group which had a mean AOFAS score of 85.4 points.Six complications were found in the plating group.The mean full weight-bearing time and radiographic bone union time were 10.1 and 8.8 weeks respectively in the plating group which had a mean AOFAS score of 89.6 points.There were no significant differences between the two groups except AOFAS score aspect.Conclusion For big side or comminuted posterior ankle fractures,the plate fixation is a good choice for patient of a necessary condition of ankle joint early functional exercise.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?