Abstract:BACKGROUND:The assignment of a point-level geocode to subjects' residences is an important data assimilation component of many geographic public health studies. Often, these assignments are made by a method known as automated geocoding, which attempts to match each subject's address to an address-ranged street segment georeferenced within a streetline database and then interpolate the position of the address along that segment. Unfortunately, this process results in positional errors. Our study sought to model the probability distribution of positional errors associated with automated geocoding and E911 geocoding.RESULTS:Positional errors were determined for 1423 rural addresses in Carroll County, Iowa as the vector difference between each 100%-matched automated geocode and its true location as determined by orthophoto and parcel information. Errors were also determined for 1449 60%-matched geocodes and 2354 E911 geocodes. Huge (> 15 km) outliers occurred among the 60%-matched geocoding errors; outliers occurred for the other two types of geocoding errors also but were much smaller. E911 geocoding was more accurate (median error length = 44 m) than 100%-matched automated geocoding (median error length = 168 m). The empirical distributions of positional errors associated with 100%-matched automated geocoding and E911 geocoding exhibited a distinctive Greek-cross shape and had many other interesting features that were not capable of being fitted adequately by a single bivariate normal or t distribution. However, mixtures of t distributions with two or three components fit the errors very well.CONCLUSION:Mixtures of bivariate t distributions with few components appear to be flexible enough to fit many positional error datasets associated with geocoding, yet parsimonious enough to be feasible for nascent applications of measurement-error methodology to spatial epidemiology.

Local Post-Stratification in Dual System Accuracy and Coverage Evaluation for the Us Census

Properties of Census Dual System Population Size Estimators

Alternative formulas for synthetic dual system estimation in the 2000 census

Intercensal and Postcensal Estimation of Population Size for Small Geographic Areas in the United States

Spatio-Temporal Mixed Models to Predict Coverage Error Rates at Local Areas

Stop or Continue Data Collection: A Nonignorable Missing Data Approach for Continuous Variables

A Bayesian hierarchical small-area population model accounting for data source specific methodologies from American Community Survey, Population Estimates Program, and Decennial Census data

Small domain estimation of census coverage: A case study in Bayesian analysis of complex survey data

Likelihood-based Estimation of Spatial Intensity and Variation in Disease Risk from Locations Observed with Error

The future of census coverage surveys

Modeling the Probability Distribution of Positional Errors Incurred by Residential Address Geocoding.

Estimating Spatial Variation in Disease Risk from Locations Coarsened by Incomplete Geocoding

Local Statistics for Spatial Panel Models with Application to the US Electorate

Efficient Treatment Effect Estimation with Out-of-bag Post-stratification

Models of linkage error for capture-recapture estimation without clerical reviews

Evaluating bias and noise induced by the U.S. Census Bureau's privacy protection methods

Exit polling and racial bloc voting: Combining individual-level and R$\times$C ecological data

A Nonparametric Approach to the Analysis of Two-Stage Mark-Recapture Experiments

Multiple Systems Estimation for Sparse Capture Data: Inferential Challenges when there are Non-Overlapping Lists

Doubly Robust Inference with Non-probability Survey Samples

Estimation and Inference on Treatment Effects Under Treatment-Based Sampling