Abstract:Objectives The purpose of this study is to analyze the procedures and contents of China's national level curriculum revision, focusing on the general framework of the 2022 revision of the elementary and middle school curriculum, and to draw implications for the revision of the Korean curriculum. Methods This study analyzed the documents and related prior research and government policy data of China's revised national curriculum for elementary and secondary schools. Goal setting, curriculum organization structure, common guidelines for subject curriculum quality control, framework document system, etc. Results First, the Chinese national curriculum is divided into three school-level curriculums: kindergarten, compulsory education schools, and high school. China's national curriculum revision cycle went through a long revision cycle of about 10 years for each school level. Second, the purpose of the revision is to emphasize the socialist state idea, to focus on core competencies for education reform in preparation for the future society, and to improve the curriculum for problem solving and educational reform. The educational goal is ‘a new human being with the ideal, ability, and responsibility required by the times’. In the curriculum organization, the 6-3 system was operated as a 5-4 system, allowing autonomy in the role of the region and school, and the integration of education between the two school levels for 9 years of compulsory education and the linkage between school levels were strengthened. Curriculum suggested key competencies, achievement standards and quality management plans based on them. In the curriculum document system, the principles and directions of curriculum revision are emphasized in the first half of both the general curriculum and each section, and the readability is clearly stated. Conclusions Implications include the stability of the Chinese curriculum revision cycle for about 10 years, the linkage of curriculum by school level and curriculum and the pursuit of independence at the same time, guidance on the role of the nation-local-school in designing and teaching the subjects. The principles of the learning process, evaluation, and operation are presented relatively clearly.

Interpretation of the First Common Core State Standards of the USA

Analysis of the“Common Career Technical Core” in the United States

Preliminary Comparison of K-12 Computing Education in China and the United States.

A Comparative Study of Pre-Service Teachers’ Views on Ethical Issues in Classroom Assessment in China and the United States

Review on the Standards of National Foreign Language of K-12 Education in American

An Interpretation of the Revised Compulsory Education Curriculum Program and Standards: A Revolution in China’s Compulsory Education

Moral priority or skill priority: a comparative analysis of key competencies frameworks in China and the United States

Is There a de Facto National Intended Curriculum? Evidence From State Content Standards

A Landmark in China’s Basic Education Curriculum Reform

On the Ideas and Trends of Educational Reform in the Present U. S.

Curriculum content mapping of the Chinese National Biology Curriculum Standards for middle school: an analysis from the OECD Education 2030 perspective

Adopting the Chinese Proficiency Grading Standards for International Chinese Language Education in North America

Education for All-Round Student Development: An Evaluation of the Compulsory Education Curriculum Program and Standards 2022

A comparative study of twenty-first century competencies in high school mother tongue curriculum standards in China, the United States and Finland

Overview of the Common Core State Standard initiative and educational reform movement from the vantage of speech-language pathologists

Core competences and scientific literacy: the recent reform of the school science curriculum in China

On the Establishment and Evolution of the Standards of Citizens' Scientific and Technological Literacy in the USA

Exploring the China's 2022 revised elementary and middle school curriculum

Common Core standards widen the opportunity gap Standards-based education reform is not a good use of U . S . taxpayers ’ time or money

An analysis of Chinese chemistry curriculum standards based on OECD Education 2030 Curriculum Content Mapping

On the Policy during the Process of Making New Standard of Science Education in America