Dosage Effect of Cisatracurium on Intubation and Intraoperative Neuromonitoring During Thyroidectomy: a Randomized Controlled Trial
Xiaoxi Li,Bin Zhang,Guohui Xu,Yuntao Song,Ling Yu,Jiaonan Yang,Hongyu Tan
DOI: https://doi.org/10.21037/gs-21-109
2021-01-01
Gland Surgery
Abstract:BACKGROUND:Intraoperative neuromonitoring (IONM) reduces the risk of recurrent laryngeal nerve (RLN) injury during thyroid surgery. However, the use of neuromuscular blocking agents (NMBAs), which are essential to improve intubation conditions, may hinder the electromyographic response during IONM. The aim of this prospective, double-blind, randomized controlled trial was to explore the optimal dosage of cisatracurium to produce adequate muscle relaxation for tracheal intubation without significantly affecting evoked potentials of IONM during thyroidectomy.METHODS:Patients undergoing thyroidectomy with IONM in our institution, with an American Society of Anesthesiologists grade of I-II, aged 18-75 years, and with a body mass index below 32 kg/m2 were enrolled and randomly assigned (by random numbers) to receive 1× (group C1) or 2× (group C2) the effective dose (ED95) of cisatracurium for tracheal intubation. The patients, surgeons, and anesthesiologists in charge were blinded to group assignment. Anesthesia was induced with sufentanil, propofol, and cisatracurium (0.05 mg/kgin group C1, 0.1 mg/kg in group C2). Ease of intubation was evaluated with the intubation condition score (Cooper score) and the intubation difficulty scale (IDS). Amplitudes of evoked potentials during intermittent IONM were compared between groups. The primary outcomes were the Cooper score, the IDS score, and the evoked potentials of IONM.RESULTS:Fifty-three patients were randomized from October 2019 to November 2020, and 52 were analyzed (with 26 patients in each group). The Cooper score was significantly lower in group C1 [median, 8.0 (interquartile range, 7.0-8.3)] than in group C2 [9.0 (9.0-9.0), P<0.001]. The rate of difficult laryngoscopy without external laryngeal pressure was significantly higher in group C1 than in group C2 (61.5% vs. 11.5%, P<0.001). More patients in group C1 required assistance to complete tracheal intubation (16 vs. 4, P=0.001). The IDS score was significantly higher in group C1 [3.0 (0.0-4.0) vs. 1.0 (0.0-1.0), P=0.045]. There were no significant differences between groups in amplitudes of evoked potentials. No serious adverse events were observed.CONCLUSIONS:A dose of 2× ED95 of cisatracurium provided better intubation conditions and easier tracheal intubation than 1× ED95, without disturbing IONM.TRIAL PROTOCOL:Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (No. ChiCTR1900022884).