Ethical thinking and effect research of multiple comprehensive psychological intervention measures used in intensive care unit
Longfei Pan,Huan Zhang,Yanxia Gao,Hui Feng,Yuan Fan,Jiangli Sun,Ce Chen,Lijun Li,Honghong Pei
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1008-9691.2019.05.024
2019-01-01
Abstract:Objective To discuss the ethical necessity and feasibility of implementing multiple comprehensive psychological intervention measures in intensive care unit (ICU), and to investigate the effect of the measures on treatment compliance. Methods The conscious adult patients hospitalized in emergency ICU (EICU) of the Second Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University from 2015 to 2017 were enrolled, and divided into control group and intervention group according to random number table, with 40 patients in each group. Patients in control group were treated with routine care and routine diagnosis and treatment, and patients in intervention group were treated with the help of psychologists and with multiple comprehensive psychological intervention measures (including nursing care, medical treatment, family and management) based on routine care and routine diagnosis and treatment. After 5 days of intervention, the treatment compliance, the medical coping attitude and the mental health were assessed respectively using the Treatment Compliance Scale, the Medical Coping Modes Questionnaire (MCMQ) and the Symptom Checklist Scale (SCL-90), and then comparation were done between the two groups. Results After 5 days of intervention, 3 patients in the control group and 4 patients in the intervention group withdraw the study because of the change of illness, and at last 37 patients in the control group and 36 in the intervention group were enrolled. There was no significant difference in basic data such as gender, age, education level, disease, course of disease, the length of EICU stay, and acute physiology and chronic health evaluationⅡ (APACHEⅡ) score between the two groups. The scores of treatment compliance in intervention group was significantly higher than that in control group (2.89±0.67 vs. 2.32±0.91, P < 0.01). Compared with the control group, the "confrontation" dimension score of the MCMQ questionnaire in intervention group was significantly increased (19.75±2.08 vs. 18.62±2.65, P < 0.05), while the "avoidance" and"surrender" dimensions scores were significantly decreased (14.22±1.91 vs. 15.14±1.92, 8.83±1.54 vs. 9.73±2.10, both P < 0.05). In the SCL-90 scale, the scores of the 5 factors such as "somatization", "interpersonal sensitivity","depression", "anxiety" and "photic anxiety" in intervention group were significantly less than those in control group (1.59±0.38 vs. 1.81±0.37, 1.72±0.40 vs. 1.93±0.42, 1.76±0.32 vs. 1.92±0.29, 1.82±0.40 vs. 2.14±0.40, 1.44±0.30 vs. 1.60±0.38, all P < 0.05), while there was no significantly difference in the scores of the other 4 factors as "obsessive-compulsive symptoms", "hostile", "bigotry" and "psychoticism" between the two groups (all P > 0.05). Conclusion The multiple comprehensive psychological intervention measures used for ICU conscious patients could improve the treatment compliance, make the patients' medical coping attitude more active and improve the mental health of the patients, so it has ethical necessity and certain feasibility.