Abstract:A number of inconsistencies are apparent in the recent research paper by Jaskolski et al. [(2007), Acta Cryst. D63, 611-620] concerning their recommendations for the values of the magnitude and resolution-dependence of the root-mean-square deviations (RMSDs) of bond lengths and angles from their restrained ideal values in macromolecular refinement, as well as their suggestions for the use of variable standard uncertainties dependent on atomic displacement parameters (ADPs) and occupancies. Whilst many of the comments and suggestions in the paper regarding updates for the ideal geometry values proposed by Engh and Huber are entirely reasonable and supported by the experimental evidence, the recommendations concerning the optimal values of RMSDs appear to be in conflict with previous experimental and theoretical work in this area [Tickle et al. (1998), Acta Cryst. D54, 243-252] and indeed appear to be based on a misunderstanding of the distinction between RMSD and standard uncertainty (SU). In contrast, it is proposed here that the optimal values of all desired weighting parameters, in particular the weighting parameters for the ADP differences and for the diffraction terms, be estimated by the purely objective procedure of maximizing the experiment-based log(free likelihood). In principle, this allows all weighting parameters that are not known accurately a priori to be scaled globally, relative to those that are known accurately, for an optimal refinement. The RMS Z score (RMSZ) is recommended as a more satisfactory statistic than the RMSD to assess the extent to which the geometry deviates from the ideal values and a theoretical rationale for the results obtained is presented in which the optimal RMSZ is identified as the calculated versus true Z-score correlation coefficient, the latter being a monotonic function of the resolution cutoff of the data. Regarding the proposal to use variable standard uncertainties, it is suggested that any departure from the current practice of using fixed weights for geometric restraints based on experimental values of standard uncertainties be subject to the same experiment-based validation.

Improved Free R Factors for Cross-Validation of Macromolecular Structure - Importance for Real-Space Refinement

Experimental determination of optimal root-mean-square deviations of macromolecular bond lengths and angles from their restrained ideal values

MD-assisted Refinement of X-Ray Coordinates

A Confidence Measure for Model Fitting with X-Ray Crystallography Data

Atomic Accuracy Models from 4.5 Å Cryo-Electron Microscopy Data with Density-Guided Iterative Local Refinement

Recent Developments in the Refinement and Analysis of Crystal Structures

I/σI vs {Rmerg, Rmeas, Rpim, CC1/2} for Crystal Diffraction Data Quality Evaluation

Refinement of F-actin model against fiber diffraction data by long-range normal modes.

New Tricks of the Trade for Crystal Structure Refinement

Modeling a Unit Cell: Crystallographic Refinement Procedure Using the Biomolecular MD Simulation Platform Amber

Simultaneous refinement of inaccurate local regions and overall structure in the CASP12 protein model refinement experiment

Significant Refinement of Protein Structure Models Using a Residue-Specific Force Field.

On the Quality of the Continuous Rotation Electron Diffraction Data for Accurate Atomic Structure Determination of Inorganic Compounds

Convergence properties of fine structure constant measurements using quasar absorption systems

Introducing the Single-Atom Real-Space Global Minimization Method for Solving Small Structures in Single Crystal X-ray Crystallography

Automated Real-Space Refinement of Protein Crystal Structures Using a Realistic Backbone Move Set

Evaluation of model refinement in CASP13

A New Method of Rigid-Body Refinement for Protein Crystal Structures

R2c: Improving Ab Initio Residue Contact Map Prediction Using Dynamic Fusion Strategy and Gaussian Noise Filter

How good are my data and what is the resolution?

Improvements in Precision of Relative Binding Free Energy Calculations Afforded by the Alchemical Enhanced Sampling (ACES) Approach