Abstract:Background The existing ECG criteria for diagnosing left bundle branch block (LBBB) are insufficient to distinguish between true and false blocks accurately. Methods We hypothesized that the notch width of the QRS complex in the lateral leads (I, avL, V5, V6) on the LBBB-like ECG could further confirm the diagnosis of true complete left bundle branch block (t-LBBB). We conducted high-density, three-dimensional electroanatomical mapping in the cardiac chambers of 37 patients scheduled to undergo CRT. These patients' preoperative electrocardiograms met the ACC/AHA/HRS guidelines for the diagnosis of complete LBBB. If the left bundle branch potential could be mapped from the base of the heart to the apex on the left ventricular septum, it was defined as a false complete left bundle branch block (f-LBBB). Otherwise, it was categorized as a t-LBBB. We conducted a comparative analysis between the two groups, considering the clinical characteristics, real-time correspondence between the spread of ventricular electrical excitation and the QRS wave, QRS notch width of the lateral leads (I, avL, V5, V6), and the notch width/left ventricular end-diastolic diameter (Nw/LVd) ratio. We performed the ROC correlation analysis of Nw/LVd and t-LBBB to determine the sensitivity and specificity for diagnostic authenticity. Results Twenty-five patients were included in the t-LBBB group, while 12 patients were assigned to the f-LBBB group. Within the t-LBBB group, the first peak of the QRS notch correlated with the depolarization of the right ventricle and septum, the trough corresponded to the depolarization of the left ventricle across the left ventricle, and the second peak aligned with the depolarization of the left ventricular free wall. In contrast, within the f-LBBB group, the first peak coincided with the depolarization of the right ventricle and a majority of the left ventricle, the second peak occurred due to the depolarization of the latest, locally-activated myocardium in the left ventricle, and the trough was a result of delayed activation of the left ventricle that did not align with the usual peak timing. The QRS notch width (45.2 ± 12.3 ms vs. 52.5 ± 9.2 ms, P < 0.05) and the Nw/LVd ratio (0.65 ± 0.19 ms/mm vs. 0.81 ± 0.17 ms/mm, P < 0.05) were compared between the two groups. After conducting the ROC correlation analysis, a sensitivity of 56% and a specificity of 91.7% for diagnosing t-LBBB using Nw/LVd were obtained. Conclusion By utilizing the current diagnostic criteria for LBBB, an increased Nw/LVd value can enhance the effectiveness of diagnosing LBBB.

Analysis of Ventricular Synchronicity in Atients with Broad "M" Shape in QRS Wave of Lead I of ECG in Left Bundle Branch Block

The Effects of QRS Duration on Left Ventricular Systolic Synchronicity in Patients with Heart Failure by Real-Time Three-Dimensional Echocardiography

Comparison Of Synchronization Between Left Bundle Branch And His Bundle Pacing In Atrial Fibrillation Patients: An Intra-Patient-Controlled Study

Electrical Synchrony Optimization for Left Bundle Branch Area Pacing in Patients with Bradycardia and Heart Failure.

Assess Dyssynchrony in Left Bundle Branch Block by Tissue Doppler Imaging

Evaluation of ventricular synchrony and systolic function in patients with right bundle branch block by tissue synchronization imaging

The spatio-temporal relationship of segmental volume and mural strain of left ventricle with wide and narrow QRS complex evaluated by dynamic three-dimensional echocardiography

Differences in left ventricular contraction in left bundle branch block with preserved and reduced ejection fraction: an evaluation using 2-dimensional speckle tracking echocardiography

Evaluation of Left Ventricular Systolic Synchrony in Patients with Ⅲ Grade Atrio-Ventricular Block after Pacemaker Implantation by Real-Time Three-Dimensional Echocardiography

Analysis of left ventricular circumferential strain in patients with left bundle branch block by layer-specific speckle tracking imaging

Difference in prevalence and pattern of mechanical dyssynchrony in left bundle branch block occurring in right ventricular apical pacing versus systolic heart failure.

Left Ventricular Systolic Motion Pattern Differs among Patients with Left Bundle Branch Block Patterns

The effect of quadripolar LV lead on cardiac synchronization and acute hemodynamic

Left Bundle Branch Pacing Versus Biventricular Pacing on Electrical Synchrony and Hemodynamics in Heart Failure Patients with Left Bundle Branch Block

Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy by Left Bundle Branch Area Pacing in Patients with Heart Failure and Left Bundle Branch Block

Assessment of Left Ventricular Systolic Synchronicity by Real-Time Three-Dimensional Echocardiography

Diagnostic Value of QRS Morphology Recorded from One Interspace Lower in Left Bundle Branch Block with Left Ventricular Hypertrophy

Evaluating left ventricular systolic synchrony of different right ventricular pacing sites by tissue Doppler imaging

The correlation between QRS duration and mechanical dyssynchrony in patients with congestive heart failure and complete left bundle branch block

Relationship Between Electrical Parameters and Cardiac Synchrony in Patients Underwent Left Bundle Branch Area Pacing

Redefining left bundle branch block from high-density electroanatomical mapping